The post Ethereum Plans a New Way to Pay Gas Without Holding ETH appeared first on Coindoo.

A user could pay in USDC while a sponsor pays in ETH

EIP-8141, or Frame Transactions, is a draft proposal for a new Ethereum transaction type. It separates the steps of a transaction into programmable frames that can verify a user’s approval, select a payer and execute the intended call.

The Hegotá Meta EIP lists Frame Transactions as scheduled for inclusion. Vitalik Buterin also shared a recent update on the proposal’s progress. The specification remains a draft, and Hegotá has not yet activated.

A lot of important progress on Frames (EIP-8141) has been quietly happening over the last few months. Highly recommend reading this, also the updated EIP https://t.co/jYqeS55j6P
https://t.co/CPYONKnWZc

— vitalik.eth (@VitalikButerin) September 5, 2026

The change would allow a user to make a transaction without personally holding ETH, provided their wallet, the application and a sponsor support the format. The sponsor could charge the user in USDC or another ERC-20, or the application could cover the fee as part of its service.

Ethereum block space would still be paid for in ETH. Frame Transactions change who provides and manages that ETH, not the underlying fee market.

What a token-paid transaction could look like

The EIP includes an example in which a sponsor pays the network fee and receives an ERC-20 payment from the user. A wallet holding USDC but no ETH could, in principle, submit a swap or transfer through the following sequence:

Putting these steps into one transaction avoids forcing the user to acquire ETH before the intended action can begin.

For a new user, that removes a common obstacle: a wallet may contain tokens but lack the native asset needed to move them. It does not remove transaction costs; it packages them in a form that the wallet or application can present more clearly.

Gas payment becomes a product decision

Frame Transactions would give wallets and applications several ways to handle the same cost. These are possible implementation models, not features that the EIP requires:

A transaction shown as gasless is still funded by an application, a sponsor or a separate token charge. EIP-8141 could give applications a standard way to subsidise that cost or recover it in an asset the user already holds.

What changes beyond earlier smart-account tools

Ethereum already supports forms of account abstraction. Pectra’s EIP-7702 gave externally owned accounts access to smart-account features such as transaction batching, sponsorship and improved recovery options.

EIP-8141 takes a different step: it introduces a dedicated transaction format in which validation and payment rules can be included natively. The proposal is designed to support alternative fee-payment schemes without depending on a centralised third-party relayer, although individual wallets and applications may still use service providers.

Gas flexibility is only one use of the same programmable structure. The proposal also aims to support key rotation, spending limits, social recovery and alternative signature systems. Hegotá’s potential privacy applications show why Frame Transactions are being considered for uses beyond flexible gas payments.

Programmable payments need clear security rules

The draft warns that custom validation code must bind an approval to the complete set of frames it authorises. Otherwise, an approval could be reused with a different set of later actions.

This does not mean Frame Transactions are inherently unsafe. It means wallets will need to show users what a signature permits, whether an application is paying the fee, and which token will be charged. Those details are essential when one transaction combines validation, payment and execution.

Sponsors also take on a practical risk. In the EIP’s ERC-20 example, a user could reduce their token balance before the sponsored transaction reaches a block. The proposal includes paymaster-solvency and public-mempool rules because a sponsor needs protection before it can fund gas for many users.

READ MORE:

DBS and Citi Test 24/7 Tokenized USD Payments

What the change could mean for ETH

Frame Transactions would shift ETH management toward wallets, sponsors and applications. A user may see a fee in USDC or no direct fee at all, but the paying account still needs ETH to settle the transaction on Ethereum.

That does not make the proposal an automatic catalyst for ETH demand. Its longer-term effect depends on whether simpler wallet flows attract more users and whether applications see enough value in covering or processing gas costs this way.

The test is adoption, not the specification

Before the feature changes the everyday wallet experience, Hegotá must activate with EIP-8141 included. Compatible wallets and applications will then need to provide clear pricing, refund logic and transaction previews.

The proposal will matter only if users can complete a safe transaction with the assets already in their wallet, without first acquiring ETH solely to pay gas.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

The post Ethereum Plans a New Way to Pay Gas Without Holding ETH appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/ethereum-pay-gas-without-holding-eth/

The post Hunter Biden Plans to Launch a Meme Coin: When and Where? appeared first on Coindoo.

The Wall Street Journal reported that Hunter Biden plans to launch a meme coin called $LAPTOP on Base on September 9. Before traders can assess the project, they will need a published contract address, allocation wallets and rules for the proposed token distribution.

When and where is $LAPTOP expected to launch?

According to the Wall Street Journal, $LAPTOP is planned for September 9 on Base, Coinbase’s Ethereum layer-2 network. Deploying a token on Base does not mean Coinbase will list or endorse it; it identifies only the network on which the token would be issued.

Hunter Biden later confirmed the planned launch in an X post, saying that $LAPTOP is scheduled to go live on Base on September 9.

$LAPTOP

September 9 pic.twitter.com/QokgWLNxgL

— Hunter Biden (@HunterBiden) September 7, 2026

The Wall Street Journal report did not identify a contract address or a project-controlled verification channel. Those details will determine whether users can distinguish the reported token from copycats after launch.

The name comes from a political controversy

The reported name most likely refers to the Hunter Biden laptop controversy that became a major political issue during the 2020 campaign. The New York Post first published material it said came from a laptop associated with Hunter Biden, while a later Washington Post forensic review verified thousands of emails as authentic communications through cryptographic evidence.

For traders, the name is a political reference, not a substitute for launch disclosures. It does not reveal how the token will be distributed, priced or supported by liquidity.

What the report says about the supply

The Wall Street Journal said the project plans to issue one billion $LAPTOP tokens. Founders, including Hunter Biden, would hold 30% of the supply. Those tokens would reportedly be locked for six months and vest fully over two years.

The newspaper also reported that 20% of supply would be distributed in two batches to wallets belonging to people who lost money on the $TRUMP meme coin, subscribers to Hunter Biden’s Substack and recipients on a mailing list curated by video journalist Andrew Callaghan.

The proposed distribution needs rules before it can be assessed

The proposed distribution is unusual because eligibility appears to depend partly on past $TRUMP trading losses. That cannot be evaluated without a stated method for measuring those losses, a wallet snapshot date, claim limits and safeguards against duplicate or automated claims.

It may bring an established political-meme-coin audience to the launch, but a distribution is not compensation merely because it targets previous token holders. The value, timing and terms of the tokens received would matter as much as eligibility.

Allocation percentages do not show the whole market structure

A reported 30% founder allocation does not by itself show how much supply will be available to trade. The practical questions are how much is circulating, how the lock is enforced, which wallets receive the tokens and how much liquidity exists when trading starts.

The published documents behind $TRUMP illustrate why a headline allocation is only the starting point. Website operations, token custody, unlocks and trading revenue can sit with different entities. $LAPTOP traders will need similar visibility into who controls the reported founder allocation and how its release schedule works.

READ MORE:

DBS and Citi Test 24/7 Tokenized USD Payments

A ticker is not a contract

Names and tickers are not unique on public blockchains. Coinbase already displays a pre-existing Base asset page using the “Hunter Biden’s Laptop” name and $LAPTOP ticker, with no stated connection to the reported September 9 launch. Coinbase also says that asset is not tradable on its platform and that the information comes from third-party sources.

Users should wait for the launch team to publish an official contract address through a verifiable channel. That address should then be checked on a Base block explorer against the announced supply, allocation wallets, contract verification status and liquidity pool.

Political token launches face closer scrutiny

The planned launch arrives while political crypto ventures are already under greater ethical scrutiny. Donald Trump’s disclosed memecoin income has renewed calls for restrictions on public officials issuing tokens.

Because Hunter Biden does not hold public office, the reported $LAPTOP launch differs from a token tied to a sitting official. It would still add another prominent U.S. political name to a market where token allocations, brand licensing and financial interests are receiving more attention.

The first useful test will come after launch: whether the team publishes a verifiable contract, visible allocation wallets and clear distribution rules. Until then, $LAPTOP remains a reported launch plan, not a token that can be assessed from its ticker or political branding.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

The post Hunter Biden Plans to Launch a Meme Coin: When and Where? appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/hunter-biden-launch-meme-coin/

The post Chainlink Price About to Cool Down? Warning Signs Start Flashing appeared first on Coindoo.

Chainlink’s rally has stalled near its recent high. LINK climbed from a June low near $6.95 to almost $13.70 before retreating toward $12.8. The rejection coincided with signals flagged by Ali Charts: a weekly exhaustion reading, higher exchange balances and less large-holder activity.

LINK had already regained momentum in mid-August, when it reclaimed its major moving averages and put $10 back in view. Its advance also coincided with a wider recovery across large-cap crypto, so no single Chainlink development or on-chain signal can explain the full move.

LINK has reached the high of its current move

The $13.70 area is the high of LINK’s advance from the June low near $6.95. Buyers need to reclaim and hold above it to show that the latest rejection was temporary rather than the start of a larger pullback.

LINK still trades above its 50-, 100- and 200-day moving averages, clustered between roughly $8.85 and $9.78. That leaves the broader recovery intact. The immediate question is whether buyers can defend the first support created by the breakout.

Three signals point to a less convincing rally

Ali Charts highlighted a weekly TD Sequential nine after LINK’s roughly 97% rise from the June low. The indicator is used to identify a trend that may be becoming exhausted. It does not predict the size of a correction, or guarantee that one will follow, but the reading carries more weight after such a sharp advance.

Ali also cited Santiment data showing exchange balances rising by about 1.75 million LINK, from roughly 269.25 million to 271 million tokens. At prices near $12.88, that represents close to $23 million in LINK. The figure measures the stock of tokens held on exchanges, not whether those tokens have been sold.

Large transactions worth more than $1 million reportedly fell from around 59 two weeks ago to about 10. That points to less activity from major holders as LINK approaches resistance. It is not enough to call the move distribution, since a lower transaction count can also mean large holders are waiting for a clearer direction.

Netflows show LINK moving onto exchanges

Exchange balances show how much LINK is already held on trading venues. CryptoQuant’s daily netflow data show whether those balances are still growing through recent transfers.

LINK recorded a positive netflow of roughly 780,000 tokens on September 1, followed by smaller positive readings through September 6. That is consistent with more LINK reaching exchanges while price was testing the high. It still does not establish that those tokens were sold: transfers can also reflect market-making, collateral movements or custody arrangements.

CryptoQuant’s exchange reserve measured in dollars rose to roughly $1.6 billion from around $1 billion in early August. That should not be counted as separate evidence of token inflows. LINK’s own price rose sharply over the same period, so the dollar value of reserves can increase even when the number of tokens on exchanges does not.

Network adoption has continued during the rally

The exchange data describe short-term supply. Circle’s addition of Chainlink Proof of Reserve to cirBTC is a separate part of the picture, giving users a way to monitor the token’s disclosed Bitcoin reserves onchain. It supports Chainlink’s infrastructure case, but it does not show whether spot demand will defend $12.25.

LINK’s setup is also not isolated from the rest of the market. The token rose during a broader rebound in major cryptocurrencies. A fresh Bitcoin-led sell-off could therefore test LINK’s support even if Chainlink’s adoption outlook remains unchanged.

$12.25 decides whether this is a pause or a cooldown

The warning case rests on a weekly TD Sequential nine, a higher LINK balance on exchanges and several days of positive exchange netflows. The reported drop in transactions above $1 million also suggests that the rally is attracting less activity from major holders near resistance.

Holding above $12.25 would leave LINK in position to retest $13.70. A sustained move through the recent high would show that the rejection was only a pause in the recovery.

The bearish case becomes stronger if LINK loses $12.25 while exchange netflows remain positive. That combination would show a failed support level alongside a larger supply of tokens reaching exchanges, putting $11.1 and then $10.3 in focus.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

The post Chainlink Price About to Cool Down? Warning Signs Start Flashing appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/chainlink-price-cool-down-warning-signs-start-flashing/

The post Solana Price Analysis September: Death Cross on the Horizon appeared first on Coindoo.

Key Takeaways

The rebound follows Solana’s August rally, when SOL briefly reached $110, its high for the month. The weekly chart now shifts attention to $105, the first resistance zone the recovery must clear.

$105 is a resistance cluster, not a single price

The 23.6% Fibonacci retracement sits at $105, close to the descending trendline and the 50-week simple moving average. Together, those levels form the first major resistance zone for SOL’s recovery.

A one-day move above that area would not change the weekly structure. SOL needs to close above $105 and hold the level after a retest before the market can treat it as support. Until then, the recovery remains a challenge to the downtrend.

RSI shows that selling pressure weakened

SOL made a lower price low during the decline into June, while its weekly RSI made a higher low. That mismatch is known as a bullish divergence: price continued to fall, but the momentum behind the sell-off weakened. It suggests that sellers were losing control into the June bottom.

That becomes more meaningful only if price follows through. A sustained weekly move above $105 would show that buyers are responding to the improvement in momentum; another rejection there would leave the divergence in place without confirming a reversal.

The death cross is already in place

The 50-week moving average has fallen below the 200-week average, creating the death-cross condition. Traders watch it because it shows the shorter-term trend has weakened below the longer-term trend, even though the crossover itself is a lagging indicator rather than a forecast for the next weekly candle.

The 50-week and 200-week averages are converging around $105, making that zone more important. The 100-week average sits in the mid-$140s, adding another barrier if SOL recovers beyond the first retracement.

Stablecoin supply rose, but trading volume fell

DeFiLlama puts Solana’s stablecoin market cap at about $16.42 billion as of writing, up 5.05% over seven days. The figure covers stablecoins circulating across the network, including balances in wallets and DeFi applications.

That matters because those stablecoins can be used to buy SOL on Solana-based exchanges or posted as collateral on onchain perpetual platforms. A larger stablecoin balance expands the pool of dollar-denominated capital available on the network, but it does not show how much is actively sitting in SOL trading pools, order books or derivatives margin.

So far, trading activity has not confirmed a broad expansion in demand. Solana’s seven-day DEX volume was down 11.02%, while perpetual-futures volume fell 5.78%. A recovery above $105 would carry more weight if turnover starts rising alongside the stablecoin balance, showing that more of that capital is entering SOL markets rather than remaining in wallets, lending protocols or payment balances.

Recent network use remains relevant – Solana fees reached record levels earlier this month, but fee growth alone does not determine the weekly chart trend.

READ MORE:

Chainlink Price About to Cool Down? Warning Signs Start Flashing

Payment Channels show where that liquidity could be used

Growing stablecoin liquidity becomes more relevant when applications give users a reason to move it. On September 3, the Solana Foundation introduced Payment Channels, which allow users or software agents to authorize a spending limit once, exchange signed payment updates offchain and settle the final balance onchain.

The Foundation said a proxy test involving 100,000 wallets issued more than one million payment updates per second. The figure does not describe Solana’s base-layer throughput: the payment updates are aggregated, and only final settlements reach the chain.

The price connection is indirect, but sustained adoption could matter for SOL’s economics. Each final settlement on Solana requires transaction fees paid in SOL, and half of every base fee is burned. If Payment Channels lead to more channel openings, settlements and other onchain activity, they could increase SOL-denominated fee demand while reducing circulating supply through the burn mechanism. That could potentially support the token only if usage becomes large and persistent; the test itself is not evidence of new SOL buying.

SOL now needs to turn $105 into support

For the recovery to gain technical credibility, SOL needs a weekly close above $105, followed by a move through $134. That would show that buyers have cleared the first Fibonacci barrier and begun to recover the damaged moving-average structure.

A rejection below $105 would keep SOL under the falling trendline and preserve the broader weekly downtrend. The RSI divergence would still show that sellers lost momentum into June, but buyers would need more evidence before the market could call the move a durable reversal.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

The post Solana Price Analysis September: Death Cross on the Horizon appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/solana-price-analysis-september-death-cross-on-the-horizon/

The post XRP Ledger Fix Nears Activation: What Changes appeared first on Coindoo.

Key Takeaways

A maintenance update for existing XRPL features

fixCleanup3_3_0 touches vaults, lending-related transactions and automated market makers, but it is not a new product launch. It bundles fixes for edge cases in existing XRPL code, intended to make those features operate more reliably.

For XRP holders, the amendment does not introduce a new use case or create automatic demand for the token – it corrects identified issues in transaction handling before these features see wider use.

Why the September 11 date is not final

The code must be available in supported server software before validators can vote to enable it. XRPL amendments then require at least 80% support from trusted validators for two consecutive weeks before activation.

The waiting period gives operators time to review the change and confirm that the network has sustained support for it. The current voting position points to September 11, but that date will move if support drops below the threshold before the period ends.

The live vote and projected activation date are available on the XRPScan amendment tracker. The amendment process applies the new transaction rules across the network only after the required consensus is reached.

What fixCleanup3_3_0 changes

The technical details are set out in the official fixCleanup3_3_0 amendment notes.

Why the technical details matter

One group of fixes applies the same freeze and deep-freeze checks when restricted assets move through vault, AMM and lending-related transaction paths. A pseudo-account is a ledger-controlled address used by a protocol feature, rather than a normal user wallet.

Other changes concern AMM operations. The amendment makes an affected AMM withdrawal return a defined transaction result instead of risking an internal exception, while adding checks around precision loss and deletion.

The amendment also changes how permissioned markets handle access and liquidity estimates. It removes certain hybrid offers when an account loses access to a permissioned domain and corrects how AMM liquidity is considered in quality estimates for permissioned order books.

Most XRP holders will not notice the update in a wallet interface. It matters more to applications using AMMs, vaults or permissioned markets, where transaction failures and incorrect liquidity calculations can affect execution.

Why lending is part of the conversation

Some of the fixes cover Single Asset Vaults and lending-related transaction flows. These are also building blocks for XRPL’s proposed native lending design, which would use vaults and loan brokers to support fixed-term loans.

The amendment does not activate native lending, which would require its own amendment and separate validator approval. Its role is narrower: it cleans up infrastructure that future lending products may use.

READ MORE:

Solana Price Analysis September: Death Cross on the Horizon

What to watch after activation

The first question is whether validator support holds long enough for the amendment to activate. After that, the practical measure is whether applications using the affected transaction types report fewer failed or inconsistent outcomes.

Broader use of vault-based products, AMMs and permissioned-market tools would be a stronger sign that the corrected infrastructure is proving useful. The amendment’s importance will show in how reliably these features work as developers and users adopt them.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

The post XRP Ledger Fix Nears Activation: What Changes appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/xrp-ledger-fix-nears-activation-what-changes/

The post Bitcoin Price Dips Under $78.5K as Golden Cross Forms appeared first on Coindoo.

Key Takeaways

Bitcoin slips below $78,500 as sellers stay active

Bitcoin fell as low as $78,350 on Bitstamp on September 8 before recovering slightly. BTC is now trading between its first Fibonacci support near $76,600 and the $79,500-$80,000 area it needs to reclaim.

Since Bitcoin broke above the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement near $76,580 in late August, that level has acted as its first daily support. The latest pullback tested the area, but BTC quickly moved back above it, keeping the recovery structure intact for now.

If BTC loses $76,600 on a daily basis, the next Fibonacci support sits near $73,000. Above the market, $82,400 remains the wider resistance zone after the recent failed move above $82,000.

Bitcoin’s short-term levels

How the golden cross aligns with $70,000 support

A golden cross forms when the 50-day simple moving average rises through the 200-day average from below. Traders consider it bullish because recent prices are strengthening faster than the longer-term trend, although the crossover is a lagging signal and cannot predict the next daily move on its own.

In this case, the crossover matters even more because it formed almost exactly at the 50% Fibonacci retracement. The 50-day average is near $69,956, the 200-day average near $69,869 and the 50% retracement near $70,063.

Those levels create a clear support cluster. A decline toward $70,000 would still weaken the short-term setup, but it would bring BTC into a stronger technical floor after the two nearer Fibonacci supports.

Binance futures data shows selling pressure

Binance futures data shows that aggressive sellers still have the upper hand despite Bitcoin’s rebound from the latest dip. A CryptoQuant analysis of Binance’s Bitcoin taker buy/sell ratio placed the reading near 0.917 as BTC traded around $79,000.

The ratio compares market buy volume with market sell volume. These are orders executed immediately against available liquidity, rather than limit orders waiting in Binance’s order book. A reading below 1 means taker sell volume exceeded taker buy volume during the measured period, showing that sellers were more willing to accept current bids than buyers were to lift current offers.

That does not measure all Bitcoin demand or prove that a wider downtrend has begun. It tracks Binance futures only, and it says nothing about spot-market flows, ETF activity or positioning on other derivatives venues. It is most useful as a short-term measure of who is driving executed futures trades.

CryptoQuant’s chart shows that the ratio has moved above and below the neutral level several times since May. Readings above 1.10, and, at times, 1.20, coincided with stronger upside phases in May and August, while sub-1 readings also appeared repeatedly through June, July and August. The current 0.917 reading therefore signals active selling pressure, not a standalone call that Bitcoin’s recovery has ended.

For BTC to reclaim the nearby resistance area, traders would want to see price recover alongside a ratio back above 1. That would show aggressive buyers, rather than sellers, are again setting the pace in Binance futures trading.

READ MORE:

XRP Ledger Fix Nears Activation: What Changes

Inflation data and Iran tensions remain in focus

Investors are waiting for U.S. August inflation data: the Producer Price Index is due on September 10, followed by the Consumer Price Index on September 11. The releases matter because they can change expectations for the Federal Reserve’s September meeting.

The PPI and CPI releases are among five events that could move crypto markets this week. Higher-than-expected inflation could reinforce expectations for restrictive policy, while softer readings would reduce that pressure on risk assets.

Unresolved U.S.-Iran tensions remain another source of uncertainty for energy markets and overall risk appetite.

Bitcoin’s next test

Bitcoin needs to hold the first support and reclaim the nearby resistance area to reopen a move toward $82,400. A break below support would bring $73,000 into focus, with the golden-cross cluster near $70,000 forming the more important level below it.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

The post Bitcoin Price Dips Under $78.5K as Golden Cross Forms appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/bitcoin-price-dips-golden-cross-forms/

The post Cronos Rollback Reverses $111M, Leaves $9.2M Unrecovered appeared first on Coindoo.

Cronos says the attacker borrowed $120.4 million

According to Cronos’ post-mortem, an attacker manipulated collateral on the Tectonic lending protocol and borrowed $120.4 million across nine markets before validators halted the network on August 30.

Cronos had initially halted block production after the Tectonic exploit, when the scale of the incident was still based on early on-chain estimates. The post-mortem now separates the value borrowed, the value reversed on Cronos and the amount that left the network before the halt.

The response window explains why some funds escaped

Cronos’ timeline shows how quickly the attack progressed. The attacker first deployed contracts and manipulated the price of TONIC. About 10 minutes later, the inflated collateral was used to borrow $120.4 million across nine markets.

The network team identified the malicious activity roughly 36 minutes after the attack began. Block production was halted later at block 90,907,150, but $9.19 million had already left Cronos by then. The amount remaining on the network could still be reversed; assets transferred beyond it could not.

Cronos resumed block production about 11 hours after the attack began, using the last pre-exploit block as the restored state.

https://t.co/h7gGiB0cw2

— Cronos Network (@CronosNetwork) September 8, 2026

How inflated TONIC collateral enabled the borrowing

Tectonic lets users deposit collateral and borrow against its value. Cronos said the attacker drove up the price of TONIC, Tectonic’s thinly traded token, then used the inflated value as collateral.

A lending protocol calculates borrowing capacity from the reported value of a user’s collateral. If that price rises sharply, the position may appear able to support a much larger loan even when the underlying market cannot sustain the valuation.

By making TONIC appear more valuable to the protocol, the attacker increased the borrowing capacity of the position and withdrew liquid assets from nine lending markets. The $120.4 million figure refers to those borrowed assets, not to the market value of TONIC itself.

Mango Markets showed a similar collateral risk

The structure has a precedent in the 2022 Mango Markets manipulation. According to the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the price of the thinly traded MNGO token rose more than thirteenfold during a 30-minute period. The artificially inflated value of the attacker’s positions was then used as collateral to withdraw more than $110 million in digital assets.

The two incidents were not identical. Mango involved manipulated MNGO spot and perpetual markets, while the Cronos account describes inflated TONIC collateral used within Tectonic’s lending markets. The shared risk is that a sharp move in a low-liquidity token can create borrowing power far beyond the amount that could be realized by selling that token in the open market.

The rollback reversed assets still on Cronos

Validators rolled the chain back to block 90,896,188, the last block before the attack. The move reversed about $111.2 million that had not left Cronos and returned affected balances to their pre-exploit state.

A validator decision on Cronos cannot rewrite transactions that have already settled on another network. Cronos said the $9.19 million that left before the halt remains beyond the rollback’s reach, leaving recovery dependent on measures outside the chain restoration.

The response also reversed unrelated transactions

The rollback removed 10,961 blocks from Cronos history, covering 1 hour and 54 minutes. Every transaction recorded during that period was reversed, including transactions unrelated to Tectonic.

Cronos said validators made the decision after weighing the finality users expect from a blockchain against the risk of leaving the borrowed assets under the attacker’s control. Restarting without restoring the earlier chain state would have left the position intact.

The important questions concern the price sources used for TONIC, the collateral and borrowing limits applied to low-liquidity assets, and the conditions under which borrowing can be paused.

Lending protocols can limit this type of exposure through several controls:

• Conservative collateral factors that cap how much can be borrowed against volatile assets
• Asset-specific borrowing caps for low-liquidity tokens like TONIC
• Isolated markets that contain the damage to a single pool
• Circuit breakers that react to abnormal price movements

No single control removes oracle-manipulation risk, but these measures can restrict how much value can be borrowed before a manipulated price is detected.

Confirmation of which safeguards were active, which ones failed and what will change would provide a clearer assessment of whether the same route could be used again. The rollback restored the chain state, but it did not by itself correct the conditions that allowed the borrowing.

What remains unresolved

Block production has resumed, and Cronos says its explorer, public RPC endpoints, indexers and subgraphs are operating. The network is working with exchanges, bridges and other affected services to reconcile their records.

Cronos says users do not need to take action while that process continues. Cronos did not identify the attacker in its post-mortem or explain how the unrecovered $9.19 million may be recovered. The rollback resolved the assets still on Cronos; the remaining amount depends on tracing and recovering funds beyond the network’s control.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

The post Cronos Rollback Reverses $111M, Leaves $9.2M Unrecovered appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/why-cronos-could-recover-tectonic-exploit/

The post Bit2Me Builds a Crypto-Seizure Unit for Police and Courts appeared first on Coindoo.

Key Takeaways

Bit2Shield connects police operations to asset recovery

Bit2Shield is the trading name of CryptoShield S.L., a separate company within Bit2Me Group. Spain’s official commercial register shows that it began operating on July 23, 2026. Its registered activities include technological investigations, forensic analysis, expert reports, operational support and blockchain intelligence.

CryptoShield’s sole shareholder and administrator is Devteam S.L., which Bit2Me identifies among the companies in its corporate group. Bitcoinforme S.L., a separate entity in the same group, operates Bit2Me’s regulated exchange services.

Bit2Me says Bit2Shield will serve police, courts, public bodies and financial institutions. Its work will extend from the initial investigation to the eventual transfer of sale proceeds.

Bit2Shield is a private service provider, not an enforcement authority. It can assist with a seizure or liquidation only under instructions from the police, a court or another competent body.

Its investigations division will be led by Adrián Maroño, a former member of the Spanish Civil Guard’s Central Operational Unit, according to a statement Bit2Me shared with CoinDesk.

The €1.5 million figure needs context

Bit2Me says it processed approximately €1.5 million in seized cryptocurrency during 2025 while working on matters involving Europol, Interpol and Spanish police. According to the company, Chainalysis was used to trace the assets before their conversion into euros for the state.

The figure shows that the group performed seizure-related work before CryptoShield was formally established. It does not reveal the number of cases, the assets involved or whether €1.5 million represents their value when seized, transferred into custody or sold.

Bit2Me describes work on matters involving Europol and Interpol, but it has not published an agency statement or agreement establishing a formal partnership with Bit2Shield.

What seizing cryptocurrency actually involves

The first difficult step in the workflow is obtaining effective control of the cryptocurrency. The assets cannot be physically removed from a blockchain; authorities must instead prevent the previous controller from moving them.

With a self-custodied wallet, investigators may need to secure a hardware wallet, private key, recovery phrase, passphrase or another signing device. Finding one item does not guarantee access. A wallet may require an additional passphrase or several signatures, while a recovered phrase may control addresses that have not yet been identified.

This distinction has become more important as criminal groups reportedly use private vaults to store crypto credentials. The coins remain recorded onchain; the physical item provides a way to authorize transactions. Investigators must still determine which addresses the recovered credentials control and whether another password, device or signature is required.

If the cryptocurrency is held by an exchange or another custodian, authorities may instead serve a lawful freezing or transfer order on that provider. United Nations guidance notes that seized virtual assets may be transferred to a secure wallet controlled by a court, law-enforcement body, asset-management office or appointed private company.

Bit2Shield may participate at several stages, but each has a different legal purpose. Tracing identifies the assets, freezing or seizure prevents them from being moved, confiscation permanently removes them through a legal decision, and disposal determines whether they are sold, retained or returned to victims.

Blockchain records are only part of the evidence

A blockchain can show that a transaction occurred, but an address does not contain the legal name of its controller. A court-ready case therefore needs evidence connecting the onchain activity to a person, account, device or organization.

Exact requirements differ by jurisdiction, but a defensible chain-of-custody record should identify where the credentials were found, who handled them, which addresses they controlled and how the assets were transferred. Transaction hashes, timestamps and access records can preserve an audit trail after the initial seizure.

Bit2Shield says it will prepare digitally signed reports and can present its findings in court. A digital signature can establish that a report has not been altered since it was signed, but it does not prove that the underlying evidence was collected correctly. The company has not publicly detailed its evidence-retention policy, forensic standards or internal access logs.

READ MORE:

Cronos Halts Chain After $75M Tectonic Exploit

Multisignature storage reduces one-key risk

Bit2Shield plans to hold seized assets in multisignature cold storage. A multisignature wallet requires a specified number of keys to approve a transaction. In a two-of-three arrangement, for example, three keys exist but any two are needed to move the assets.

This can prevent one lost or compromised key from exposing the entire wallet. It can also divide approval between the service provider and the authority that ordered the seizure. If one organization controls enough keys to meet the threshold, however, it can still move the assets without an outside signer.

Bit2Me has not disclosed how many key shares Bit2Shield will create, who will hold them or whether a court or public authority will control at least one required signature. It has also not specified its recovery procedure, insurance coverage or liability if credentials are lost or misused.

Allegations involving the theft of $46 million from U.S. federal seizure wallets illustrate the risk created when contractors or employees receive excessive access to government-controlled assets. Moving keys offline reduces exposure to remote attacks, but it does not remove insider-access risk.

Authorities decide when seized crypto is sold

The competent authority, not Bit2Shield, will decide whether and when seized assets are sold.

That decision can materially affect the recovered amount because cryptocurrency prices may change between the initial seizure and the conclusion of a case. An early sale removes further price exposure but fixes the asset’s value at that point. Holding it preserves the possibility of appreciation while leaving the state or potential recipients exposed to losses.

Governments do not always follow the same approach. A proposed Arizona reserve funded with seized criminal assets, for example, would allow certain cryptocurrency to be retained rather than automatically converted into cash. The proposal shows that retention and liquidation are separate policy choices. Under Bit2Shield’s model, its role in a sale begins only after the competent authority orders one.

Bit2Me has not identified the trading venues, pricing benchmark, fees or slippage controls that would apply to a court-ordered sale. It has also not explained how Bit2Shield would handle a seized token without a liquid euro market.

Why the regulatory split matters

Bit2Shield says its investigative, forensic,, expert-report and training activities fall outside the scope of MiCA because CryptoShield S.L. is not operating as a crypto-asset service provider. When a case requires cryptocurrency cryptocurrency to be exchanged for euros, Bitcoinforme S.L. will conduct the conversion.

Bitcoinforme appears in the CNMV register of authorized crypto-asset service providers. That identifies the legal entity expected to perform the regulated exchange service rather than extending the same status automatically to CryptoShield.

The announcement does not identify which legal entity will act as custodian while assets remain in multisignature storage. Contracts with public authorities will need to define who controls the wallets, which which company bears responsibility for the assets and what protections apply before liquidation.

What authorities should establish before using Bit2Shield

Before appointing Bit2Shield, a public institution would need clear answers to five operational operational questions:

Until those controls are publicly disclosed, outside observers cannot fully assess the custody and execution safeguards behind behind Bit2Shield’s services.

The post Bit2Me Builds a Crypto-Seizure Unit for Police and Courts appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/bit2me-builds-crypto-seizure-unit-police-courts/

The post Charles Hoskinson Net Worth: How Rich is Cardano’s Founder in 2026? appeared first on Coindoo.

He co-founded Ethereum, walked away from it, and then built Cardano into a top-20 blockchain, all while pouring money into bison ranches, longevity medicine and de-extinction biotech in rural Wyoming. His fortune is real, large and almost entirely illiquid, tied up in a token he refuses to sell and a private engineering firm whose books stay closed. Pinning it down means separating what he holds from what he says he holds, and both have moved hard over the past year.

From Ethereum exile to Cardano’s architect

Born in Hawaii in 1987, Hoskinson studied mathematics in Colorado before dropping into crypto early, first as a Bitcoin miner and educator. In 2013 he became one of the original co-founders of Ethereum and briefly served as its first chief executive, until a split with Vitalik Buterin over whether the project should run as a company or a nonprofit ended with his removal in 2014. He lost that argument and the platform, then built a rival. In 2015 he founded Input Output Hong Kong, now Input Output Global, and in 2017 launched Cardano as a blockchain where every protocol change is supposed to pass peer review before it ships. That academic streak defines both the network and the man, and it is the reason his wealth sits inside a single ecosystem rather than spread across a diversified book.

The ADA he won’t sell, and everything else on-chain

Most of Hoskinson’s money is in cryptocurrency, and most of that is in the token he created. He has said he ranks among the single largest individual holders of ADA and that he has not sold a single one since 2017, a position he keeps to stay aligned with the network. He will not disclose wallet addresses or a count, so the exact size stays a black box. The scale shows up indirectly through his losses instead.

The size of that exposure became public when the market turned. Speaking from Tokyo in February 2026, Hoskinson said his personal crypto holdings were down more than $3 billion in paper value and that he had no intention of liquidating. He framed the disclosure as a rebuttal to the idea that founders are insulated from the pain that hits retail. A month earlier he had put the four-year figure at roughly $2.5 billion in an interview with Scott Melker. A $3 billion swing is only possible if the underlying stack ran into the billions at its peak, which tells you more about the true scale of his ADA than any figure he has volunteered.

A word on that $3 billion, because the wording matters. An unrealized loss exists only on paper and turns real the moment a holder sells. Hoskinson has not sold, so the number measures how far his position has fallen from its high, not cash that left his accounts. That distinction is the whole reason he can claim a billion-dollar net worth and a multibillion-dollar loss in the same breath.

Beyond the blockchain: the businesses Hoskinson bankrolls

Hoskinson runs his empire through two engines: Input Output Global, the firm that builds Cardano, and the Hoskinson Family Office, his private investment wing. Around those sit a cluster of physical ventures in Wyoming that look less like a portfolio and more like a set of personal convictions with a bank account attached. Several of them lost money heavily in 2026, and the way he handled those losses says as much about his balance sheet as any token holding.

Input Output Global: the engine behind Cardano

IOG, formerly IOHK, is the commercial heart of the operation. Hoskinson founded it and holds the majority stake, and it holds the enterprise contracts and digital-asset treasuries that anchor his more stable wealth. It is also increasingly exposed to Cardano’s new on-chain governance. Under the network’s decentralized treasury, IOG has had to request funding directly from ADA holders rather than command it.

• Founder and majority owner; the primary firm contracted to build and maintain Cardano.
• Filed a 2026 development funding request of $46.8 million, down from $97.5 million in 2025; delegates approved core items while pushing back on its wider research package.
• Hoskinson has warned that a failed vote could force staff cuts and the closure of its research lab.
• Third-party aggregators loosely estimate baseline annual service revenue near $11.9 million, a figure IOG has not confirmed.

Midnight: the privacy bet incubated inside IOG

Midnight is a standalone blockchain built under the IOG umbrella, aimed at programmable privacy and data protection. It is early-stage and pre-revenue, but Hoskinson has repeatedly named it alongside Cardano as his central focus, which makes it a strategic asset rather than a cash one.

• Positioned as a data-protection and rational-privacy layer.
• In active development; no independent valuation exists.
• One of the two projects Hoskinson said he is now fully focused on.

The “Mayo Clinic of the West” that ran out of cash

The Hoskinson Health and Wellness Clinic in Gillette was the most ambitious and most expensive of the real-world ventures. It opened in 2022 with the goal of bringing advanced specialty care to rural Wyoming, and it never turned a profit. His brother and clinic co-founder William Hoskinson said Charles had spent nearly $250 million on infrastructure, salaries and local investment and had received not a single penny of reimbursement.

• Cut around 40 positions in January 2026 after admitting it grew too fast.
• Announced in May that it would close on July 31, citing multi-million-dollar losses.
• In June the family said it was in advanced talks to sell to a large hospital chain to preserve care.

Bison, concrete and the Wyoming build-out

Supporting the clinic and the ranch was a set of local operating companies, and they proved to be the weakest link. The construction and concrete firms were created mainly to build the clinic, never became profitable, and were wound down to stop the cash bleeding. The ranch itself is a long-horizon asset rather than an income stream.

• An 11,000-acre bison ranch in Wyoming supporting up to 600 animals.
• Hoskinson Contracting and Concrete laid off a combined 136 workers in December 2025.
• Heavy overhead for land, wildlife management and agricultural technology keeps the ranch capital-intensive.

W3i Software and the USDM stablecoin

Through the Hoskinson Family Office, he has taken equity in outside ventures that feed back into the Cardano thesis. The clearest is W3i Software, the developer behind USDM, Cardano’s first regulated fiat-backed stablecoin.

• The Family Office deployed a $1.5 million strategic investment into the firm.
• The stake supports MiCA-compliant stablecoin infrastructure tied to Cardano’s regulated DeFi push.

Colossal Biosciences and the woolly mammoth

The most eye-catching bet is Colossal Biosciences, the genetic de-extinction startup working on species like the woolly mammoth and the dire wolf. It carries a multibillion-dollar private valuation but almost no revenue, which makes it a pure research position rather than a wealth generator.

• Equity stake in a heavily venture-backed biotech firm.
• Negligible revenue; value sits entirely in long-term genetic intellectual property.

READ MORE:

5 Things You Should Know Before Trading Crypto

From a $62 million raise to an $8 billion network

Because Hoskinson’s fortune tracks ADA, the token’s own trajectory is the single most useful gauge of his wealth. Cardano launched in 2017 after an ICO that raised roughly $62 million at an initial price around $0.0024. It climbed to an all-time high of $3.10 on September 2, 2021, then spent the following years grinding down. In June 2026 it slipped below 20 cents to a four-year low, and it now trades near $0.22 for a market capitalization around $8.2 billion, which keeps it inside the top 20 by size. That is roughly 93% below its peak.

The network kept shipping even as the price fell. Cardano activated its Van Rossem hard fork in July 2026, lowering smart contract costs and opening the door to community-led upgrades, and IOG announced that core development would shift toward external teams as part of a decentralization push. Not every signal was positive. Grayscale dropped its plans for Cardano exchange-traded funds in August 2026, and critics have kept up the “ghost chain” charge over the gap between the network’s valuation and its on-chain usage. For Hoskinson, every one of these developments is also a personal balance-sheet event.

So how much is Charles Hoskinson worth?

The honest answer is that no confirmed figure exists, and the range is wide. Hoskinson has given his own estimate of roughly $1.2 billion, a number he repeated to DL News and has not walked back, and he frames that capital as what lets him fund unconventional projects. Independent trackers are more conservative. Most 2026 estimates cluster between $600 million and $800 million, though Traders Union’s model lands close to his own $1.2 billion. Forbes first put him at $500 million to $600 million back in 2018. During the 2021 peak, when ADA was near its record, his on-paper wealth would have topped $4 billion.

Take the midpoint and Hoskinson is comfortably a billionaire on his own accounting and a near-billionaire on everyone else’s, with the gap explained by how much credit you give to assets that live in private wallets and private companies. The bigger point sits underneath the number. He has spent the past year retreating from the physical ventures that drained hundreds of millions, closing companies, laying off staff and preparing to hand off the clinic. What is left is a fortune deliberately concentrated on two things he controls and refuses to trim: his ADA and the firm that builds Cardano. That concentration is a choice, and its payoff now depends on a governance vote in Cardano’s treasury and a token that would need to multiply several times over just to get back to where his paper wealth stood five years ago.

The post Charles Hoskinson Net Worth: How Rich is Cardano’s Founder in 2026? appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/charles-hoskinson-net-worth/

The post Robinhood Takes Stakes in Crypto.com and OG.com appeared first on Coindoo.

Key Takeaways

Robinhood is buying exposure, not control

Robinhood agreed to take minority stakes in Crypto.com and its prediction-market business, OG.com, according to a September 8 report from The Wall Street Journal.

Under the multiyear agreement, Robinhood will add event contracts backed by OG.com to its app. Crypto.com also told the newspaper that it had separated OG.com into a standalone company.

The companies did not disclose Robinhood’s ownership percentages, investment amounts or governance rights. A minority position gives Robinhood an economic interest in the businesses without necessarily giving it operational control.

As of publication on September 8, neither company had issued a separate announcement, and Robinhood had not filed the investment terms with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. The WSJ report, which includes comments from executives involved in the agreement, remains the main public source.

Event contracts generated more Q2 revenue than crypto

Robinhood earned more from event contracts than cryptocurrency transactions during the second quarter.

Event contracts supplied $156 million of Robinhood’s $776 million in transaction-based revenue, or roughly one-fifth of the total. The company also reported a record 13.6 billion event contracts traded during the quarter.

That contract count measures activity rather than revenue or total trading value. Robinhood defines it as the number of contracts bought or sold through its Prediction Markets Hub, with each contract worth $1 when it settles.

A distribution agreement allows Robinhood to earn fees from customer activity. The minority stakes add a separate source of exposure to the value of Crypto.com and OG.com, although the undisclosed investment terms prevent that exposure from being measured.

OG.com is the platform, while CDNA runs the market

OG.com is the consumer-facing platform and brand. When Crypto.com launched OG in February, the service offered contracts covering sports, financial data, politics, entertainment and other real-world outcomes.

The regulated market behind those contracts is Crypto.com Derivatives North America, or CDNA. The Crypto.com affiliate is registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission as a designated contract market and derivatives clearing organization.

Robinhood currently distributes event contracts to its customers through Robinhood Derivatives, a registered futures commission merchant. The companies have not disclosed whether the new OG.com-backed contracts will use exactly the same operating structure as Robinhood’s existing products.

How an event contract works

Most event contracts present two possible outcomes, usually “yes” and “no.” A “yes” position bought for $0.70 pays $1 if the specified outcome occurs, producing a 30-cent profit before fees. It settles at zero if the outcome does not occur.

The CFTC explains that these contracts have a fixed payout and an expiration linked to a date or the conclusion of an event. Robinhood says customers can also sell eligible positions before the event ends, with prices moving as market expectations change.

Federal oversight does not end state disputes

CDNA operates within the federal derivatives framework, allowing its products to be offered as regulated event contracts rather than conventional sportsbook wagers.

That federal status has not prevented challenges from state gaming regulators. Connecticut previously ordered Robinhood, Crypto.com and Kalshi to stop offering certain sports contracts, arguing that the products fell under state wagering laws.

The dispute affects what customers can access. A contract available through Robinhood in one state may be unavailable in another, even when the exchange listing it operates under CFTC oversight.

OG.com adds another source of Robinhood contracts

Robinhood’s existing disclosures name KalshiEX, ForecastEx and Rothera as exchanges through which Robinhood Derivatives offers event contracts. The OG.com agreement appears to add contracts backed by CDNA to that network.

Rothera is also connected to Robinhood through a joint venture with Susquehanna International Group. The exchange and clearinghouse was created through the acquisition of the CFTC-licensed MIAXdx business, and Robinhood began routing selected contracts to Rothera in June.

Robinhood has not announced changes to its relationships with KalshiEX, ForecastEx or Rothera. OG.com therefore appears to expand its venue network rather than replace one of its existing providers.

Ownership makes routing disclosures more important

Robinhood will have financial interests connected to more than one business behind the contracts distributed through its app. It already participates in the Rothera joint venture and now plans to own stakes in Crypto.com and OG.com.

Customers need clear disclosure of where each contract is listed, how orders are routed and which exchange fees apply. Robinhood currently charges its own commission, while the exchange supporting a contract may impose an additional fee.

The contract rules also matter. Two markets can ask what appears to be the same question while using different deadlines, data sources or settlement conditions. They are therefore not automatically interchangeable, even when their wording and prices look similar.

READ MORE:

Cronos Halts Chain After $75M Tectonic Exploit

Crypto.com’s reported valuation needs clarification

Crypto.com announced in July that Citadel Securities had invested $400 million at a $20 billion company valuation.

The WSJ report instead places Crypto.com’s valuation at $15 billion and OG.com’s at $5 billion. The available public information does not explain the difference between Crypto.com’s official figure and the valuation reported by the newspaper.

The figures cannot be reconciled without further disclosure. Robinhood’s investment amount and ownership percentages are also needed before the cost or value of its stakes can be calculated.

What changes for Robinhood customers

The clearest customer-facing change is access to a broader range of event contracts. JB Mackenzie, Robinhood’s vice president and general manager of futures and prediction markets, told the WSJ that the agreement would help the brokerage provide more variety and better pricing.

Several practical details have not been published:

The companies have also discussed equity-linked perpetual futures, according to the WSJ. Those discussions are not a product announcement. Any launch would require regulatory approval, and no timetable or contract terms have been disclosed.

The next material disclosures are the size of Robinhood’s stakes, the launch date for OG.com-backed contracts, the venue-routing rules and the fees customers will pay.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

The post Robinhood Takes Stakes in Crypto.com and OG.com appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/robinhood-stakes-crypto-com-og/