The post Bitcoin Fell Before Every Past US Midterm – Will 2026 Repeat It? appeared first on Coindoo.

Three observations is not a pattern in any statistical sense. Three consecutive declines occur by chance often enough that the record proves nothing on its own, and the measurement windows are not even identical: the 2018 and 2022 ranges cover nine weekly candles, while 2014 covers seven.

What makes the record worth examining is that a mechanism does connect Bitcoin to the midterm calendar. It has nothing to do with voting.

Key Takeaways

What the Three Cycles Actually Show

TradingView measurements across the highlighted late-summer windows:

CoinGlass quarterly data extends the picture into October through December, covering the final campaign month and election day:

Fourth quarters are usually Bitcoin’s strongest, though the historical averages are inflated by triple-digit rallies from a market a fraction of today’s size. The useful observation is simpler: BTC was falling before voters reached the polls and kept falling afterwards, in all three cases.

Two Four-Year Clocks Running in Step

Bitcoin halvings occurred in November 2012, July 2016, May 2020 and April 2024. Midterm elections fall in November 2014, 2018, 2022 and 2026.

Both intervals are four years long, which locks them into a fixed relationship.

Bitcoin’s floors have historically arrived 26 to 30 months after each halving. Applied to the dates above, that puts the low in January 2015 at $155, December 2018 near $3,160, and November 2022 around $15,550.

Each of those lands on or immediately after a midterm election.

The August–September declines and negative fourth quarters were the closing stage of three bear markets, timed by the halving schedule rather than the electoral one. Two calendars four years apart will most likely align for years ahead , and the alignment carries no causation in either direction.

As our analysis of previous cycle bottoms shows, that late-stage weakness reflected seller exhaustion reaching its end point.

What the Halving Reading Predicts for 2026

Treating the record as electoral produces one expectation: another decline into November.

Treating it as halving-driven produces a different one. April 2024 plus the historical 26-to-30-month interval places this cycle’s floor somewhere in mid-to-late 2026.

Bitcoin’s quarterly returns fit that timeline. BTC lost 22.2% in Q1 and 14.1% in Q2 before gaining 9.3% in Q3 as of July 30, having fallen roughly half from its October 2025 peak. That is the shape of a market which could be working through the end of a drawdown, not one anticipating an election.

The distinction matters for what happens after November. An election-driven reading implies pressure lifting once results are known. A halving-driven one implies the floor forms when selling exhausts itself, whatever the calendar says.

Each Midterm Also Carried Its Own Disaster

The timing explains the shape. Specific crises explain the depth.

Bitcoin entered the 2014 window after the failure of Mt. Gox, which had handled a substantial share of global BTC trading. Its collapse removed a major source of liquidity and exposed how dependent the young market remained on a handful of centralized exchanges.

By 2018 the market was still unwinding the speculative boom that peaked in late 2017, with the ICO market collapsing and retail demand evaporating.

November 2022 brought the failure of FTX, which accelerated an existing bear market. The SEC later alleged customer funds had been diverted to Alameda Research while FTX concealed the relationship.

Those were structural failures inside a market dominated by retail speculation, leverage and crypto-native intermediaries. Any one of them would overwhelm an election as a price driver.

Spot ETFs Broke One Link in the Chain

No previous midterm period included U.S. spot exchange-traded products. The SEC approved them in January 2024, opening a regulated route for advisers, asset managers and brokerage clients.

ETFs offer no protection against a 20% or 30% decline, and they transmit redemptions as efficiently as they attract inflows. What they change is the source of pressure. Bitcoin now trades inside traditional portfolios alongside equities, bonds and commodities, which reduces its exposure to any single exchange failing and increases its sensitivity to Treasury yields, real rates, oil and global liquidity.

The crises that deepened the previous three drawdowns were crypto-native. The forces most likely to deepen this one are macro.

READ MORE:

Robert Kiyosaki Says Bitcoin Should Pay You But Here’s the Catch

Energy Prices Are the Live Risk

The Iran conflict is the more direct threat to Bitcoin before November.

A June agreement reopened the Strait of Hormuz and increased shipping traffic, letting the U.S. Energy Information Administration lower its oil-price forecasts, with production and trade flows expected near pre-conflict levels by the end of 2026.

The situation stays fragile. U.S. strikes resumed in July, and according to Reuters, Ipsos polling found 79% of Americans expecting military involvement to continue for an extended period, with 60% expecting the conflict to worsen gasoline prices over the following year.

The transmission runs through energy and monetary policy: renewed disruption at Hormuz restricts oil supply, higher energy and transport costs feed inflation, persistent inflation limits the Federal Reserve’s room to cut, and higher-for-longer rates constrain the liquidity available to risk assets.

Bitcoin can absorb a military headline in one session. Months of elevated energy prices under restrictive policy are harder to shrug off.

We examined why the initial Iran shock failed to break Bitcoin: BTC had already fallen roughly 50% from its peak before the conflict started, leaving fewer leveraged positions to liquidate. Surviving an initial shock is a different test from trading for months under inflationary pressure.

Gridlock Might Hit Altcoins, Not Bitcoin

The next federal general election falls on November 3, 2026. A July Washington Post/Ipsos poll found the economy and high prices cited most often as vote drivers, at 54% of registered voters, with Iran, Israel and foreign policy at 20%.

Decision Desk HQ’s July forecast gives Democrats a 62% chance of taking the House and Republicans a 57% chance of holding the Senate, making divided control the likeliest outcome.

Bitcoin already has regulated spot products and an established route into U.S. portfolios. Many altcoins, exchanges and token issuers are still waiting for Congress to define whether their assets fall under SEC or CFTC oversight.

The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act passed the House 294-134 in July 2025, and the Senate Banking Committee advanced it 15-9 on May 14, with Democrats Ruben Gallego and Angela Alsobrooks joining all 13 Republicans. It now awaits a floor vote, expected to merge first with a related bill from the Senate Agriculture Committee.

Gridlock is not good for Bitcoin. It is just worse for everything else.

Passage might flip that. Clearing the Senate would remove the classification question, and sentiment tends to respond to resolved uncertainty more than to any particular rule. Bitcoin would gain from the broader risk appetite; altcoins and U.S. crypto businesses would gain from the substance.

What Could Confirm or Break the Reading

The halving explanation strengthens if Bitcoin’s Q3 recovery holds through the autumn untill the end of the quarter and a durable floor forms in late 2026 regardless of the election result. It weakens if BTC gives back the Q3 gain and keeps falling well into 2027, which would put the drawdown outside the historical 26-to-30-month window.

Watch for sustained ETF outflows, renewed disruption at Hormuz, rising inflation expectations, or another crypto insolvency. Any of those would deepen the decline through channels unconnected to either calendar.

If Bitcoin falls again before and after November, the midterm will be the date attached to it. The halving clock and the oil price might explain the size.

The post Bitcoin Fell Before Every Past US Midterm – Will 2026 Repeat It? appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/bitcoin-fell-midterm-will-repeat/

The post BlockDAG’s $0.00000019 Entry Closes in 24 Hours as Zcash and XRP Test Key Levels appeared first on Coindoo.

This publication is sponsored and written by a third party. Coindoo does not endorse or assume responsibility for the content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or any other materials on this page.

Market activity is shifting across major networks as traders review where momentum may build next. Zcash price remains around $470 to $500 with a $8 billion market cap while testing resistance near $506. At the same time, XRP price trades at $1.08 after moving above $1.13, backed by $2.6 billion in derivatives open interest.

Apart from usual market trends, BlockDAG (BDAG) is drawing interest as another key update approaches. Market participants reviewing current crypto projects continue returning to this coin’s recent growth.

Over the next 24 hours, users can access BDAG at a limited campaign price of $0.00000019 under the project’s stated terms. Along with this entry, Live Swap is active at 22% below the CoinMarketCap rate, according to the project. With claims for Batches 1–6 going fully live in 24 hours along with staking, BlockDAG combines campaign pricing, claims access, and direct staking utility.

Zcash Price Faces Important $506 Resistance Level

Recent action shows Zcash trying to flip the $470 to $506 resistance band into support after a steady rise from earlier lows. Even though strength has improved, traders still wait for volume support before pushing the Zcash price higher.

The asset continues forming higher lows above its $440 to $480 demand zone. While indicators show neutral signals, main moving averages provide solid backing. This technical base has helped hold the Zcash price steady, keeping the wider recovery trend in place.

Now trading near $460 to $500 with a $8 billion market cap, the coin remains range-bound. A strong daily close above supply zones may open the way toward $621, shaping the next long-term path for the Zcash price.

XRP Price Targets Upside After Break Above Resistance

Price action pushed XRP to $1.08 after breaking the $1.13 resistance mark, pointing to possible movement toward $1.30. Better volume and slightly rising On-Balance Volume suggest buyers are returning to support the XRP price.

Analyst Ali Charts confirmed the move above $1.13 and pointed to $1.30 as the next key level. At the same time, derivatives open interest reached $2.6 billion, showing higher trading activity. This mix of strength and rising engagement suggests the XRP price may continue its recovery if current levels stay firm.

Support stands near $1.10, and holding above this level will be key to keeping positive momentum and guiding the XRP price toward higher targets.

BlockDAG’s $0.00000019 Entry Closes in 24 Hours

Many market participants reviewing active crypto projects are paying attention to the latest BlockDAG update. The setup highlights a limited campaign structure: users can access BDAG at $0.00000019 for the next 24 hours under the project’s stated terms, along with a Live Swap running at 22% below the CoinMarketCap price, according to the project.

Timing tied to this update also holds importance. Within 24 hours, claims for Batches 1–6 are scheduled to go fully live together with staking. This access to claiming and staking gives users a clear way to participate in the project’s reward structure under its stated conditions.

System support stands behind this update, explaining the rising attention around BDAG. Growth is backed by a live Casino and Sportsbook, upcoming Tier 1 exchange listings, the BlockDAG Exchange, and a complete Super App, showing active use and steady expansion beyond simple market movement.

With a 24-hour price window, staking access, and a growing utility base, BlockDAG remains one of the names being discussed in current crypto market activity. Interest in BDAG continues to rise as more users review the project’s claims, staking, and ecosystem updates.

Summing Up

Zcash price keeps testing resistance at $508 with a $8 billion market cap, while XRP price trades near $1.08 after crossing $1.13 with $2.6 billion in open interest. Both coins show stable setups, yet BlockDAG presents a different case.

With claims and staking scheduled to go live in 24 hours, a limited campaign price of $0.00000019, a 22% Live Swap gap, and a growing system from Super App to Tier 1 listings, BlockDAG stands out in current crypto discussions. Future outcomes will depend on eligibility, execution, liquidity, adoption, broader market conditions, and the project’s ability to complete its stated roadmap and program terms.

Presale: https://purchase.blockdag.network
Website: https://blockdag.network
Telegram: https://t.me/blockDAGnetworkOfficial
Discord: https://discord.gg/Q7BxghMVyu

This publication is sponsored and written by a third party. Coindoo does not endorse or assume responsibility for the content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or any other materials on this page. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research before engaging in any cryptocurrency-related actions. Coindoo will not be liable, directly or indirectly, for any damages or losses resulting from the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services mentioned.

The post BlockDAG’s $0.00000019 Entry Closes in 24 Hours as Zcash and XRP Test Key Levels appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/blockdags-0-00000019-entry-closes-in-24-hours-as-zcash-and-xrp-test-key-levels/

The post South Korea’s 2027 Crypto Tax: What Traders Need to Know Now appeared first on Coindoo.

Key Takeaways

Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Koo Yun-cheol told the National Assembly’s Finance and Economy Planning Committee on July 29 that taxation is proceeding as scheduled, answering lawmakers who had asked whether another deferral was needed.

The same committee sent a repeal bill to subcommittee review that day. Only one of those two events represents the government’s position.

Under the current law, annual net gains above 2.5 million won face a 20% national income tax plus a 2% local levy, for a combined 22%. At exchange rates in late July 2026, that exemption sits near $1,750.

The rate has drawn most of the attention. Three other features of the design will matter more to ordinary users: what happens to losses, how the exemption compares with the tax stocks no longer pay, and whether anyone can calculate their liability accurately.

A Losing Year Buys Nothing Back

Gains and losses net within a single tax year. Across years, they do not.

Crypto income falls under the “other income” category rather than being treated as a capital gain, and that classification carries no loss carryforward. A year ending in losses is simply a year with no taxable income.

The arithmetic turns hostile in a volatile market. Take an investor who loses 10 million won in 2027 and makes 10 million won in 2028, ending two years exactly where they started. The 2027 loss disappears. The 2028 gain is taxed above the exemption, producing a bill near 1.65 million won on a portfolio that made nothing.

Lawmakers raised precisely this at the July 29 session, arguing that a system which cannot deduct losses from later years fails to reflect investors’ actual income. They also warned that taxation could push users toward overseas exchanges, decentralised platforms and peer-to-peer trading to avoid it.

Koo’s answer was that stock investments receive the same treatment, and that the government would implement first and supplement afterwards if the system proved to need it.

He also set out why the classification exists. The United States and the United Kingdom tax crypto under capital gains systems, while Korea treats it as other income, taxed separately at 22% with a basic deduction. Moving to a capital gains model, Koo said, would require a comprehensive review of the capital market as a whole rather than of virtual assets alone.

That reasoning holds and sidesteps the volatility problem. An asset class where 50% annual drawdowns are routine produces losing years far more often than a diversified equity portfolio, so identical treatment produces very different outcomes.

Twenty Times Below the Stock Tax

The comparison animating the domestic argument concerns a tax that no longer exists.

South Korea’s Financial Investment Income Tax would have applied 20% to 25% on annual gains above 50 million won from stocks, bonds, funds and derivatives. The 2024 tax revision abolished it and kept the existing capital gains regime, and the National Assembly passed the amendment in December 2024, the same session that pushed crypto taxation back to 2027.

Retail stock investors therefore face no capital gains tax on domestic listed shares, while crypto investors will pay above an exemption one-twentieth the size of the one stocks escaped.

The Ministry of Economy and Finance rejects the unfairness framing, noting that major shareholders, overseas stocks and unlisted shares already face taxation, so exempting virtual assets while taxing other financial income would create its own inconsistency. On classification, it argues that International Financial Reporting Standards treat virtual assets as intangible assets, making miscellaneous income the workable category, and one that captures staking and airdrop earnings without legal ambiguity.

Both positions are defensible. The gap between 50 million won and 2.5 million won is what the domestic political fight is actually about.

Who the Exemption Reaches

A 2.5 million won deduction protects someone who buys and holds. It offers less to anyone trading actively through a volatile year.

An investor recording 10 million won in net profit pays on 7.5 million won, producing a liability near 1.65 million won. Reaching that level of gain requires neither wealth nor professional scale during a strong altcoin run.

The Financial Services Commission counted 11.13 million trade-enabled exchange accounts at the end of 2025, with average daily volume of 5.4 trillion won across the second half of the year. Those figures count accounts rather than individuals, and they establish the breadth of participation rather than the size of any particular holding.

Account balances say little here. The tax measures annual realised gains, so a trader recycling modest capital through many positions can cross the line while ending December with very little, and a large passive holder can stay under it indefinitely by not selling.

A Swap Creates Tax Without Producing Cash

Taxation does not wait for a withdrawal to Korean won.

The National Tax Service includes exchanges between virtual assets in its income calculation. Swapping Bitcoin for Ether, rotating an altcoin into USDT, or moving between stablecoins each realises a gain or loss.

An investor who bought Bitcoin at 20 million won and swapped it for Ether when the BTC was worth 27 million won realised 7 million won at that moment. If the Ether then falls, the tax survives the loss and no cash ever reached a bank account.

Establishing that figure requires the original acquisition cost, the won value at the exact moment of the swap, trading and network fees, the account or wallet involved, and whether a given transfer was a disposal or a move between the user’s own addresses.

Several trades on one domestic exchange make that straightforward. Activity spread across centralised platforms, self-custody wallets, bridges and decentralised protocols does not.

The Compliance Infrastructure Does Not Exist Yet

This is the part of the regime least ready for the people it will govern.

Cost basis follows two methods. Assets traded through a registered virtual-asset service provider use a moving-average calculation. Crypto held outside those platforms uses first-in, first-out, with acquisition costs computed per virtual-asset address.

Consider what that demands of an ordinary user: buy USDT on a Korean exchange, withdraw to a personal wallet, bridge to another chain, swap into Ether, deposit into a liquidity pool, withdraw a different set of assets months later. Every step leaves a blockchain record. None of those records identifies which wallets belong to the same taxpayer, converts values into won at the moment of each transaction, or determines whether a receipt token represents a disposal.

Guidance covers sales, lending and crypto-to-crypto exchanges clearly. It thins out across liquidity-pool deposits, wrapped tokens, staking derivatives and cross-chain bridging, which is where a large share of activity now sits.

The practical consequence deserves stating plainly: a Korean investor who fully intends to comply may be unable to file an accurate return. Reconstructing thousands of transactions manually is unrealistic, and commercial tax software produces conflicting figures when prices are illiquid, contract interactions are misclassified, or histories span several chains.

That builds an accidental-evasion trap into the system. Two honest users with identical activity can file different numbers because their tools disagree, and the taxpayer carries the consequences either way — underreporting without knowing, or overpaying because acquisition costs cannot be documented.

Exchange Reporting Covers Only the First Hop

Registered exchanges will file transaction data with the National Tax Service, which handles ordinary spot trading on a single Korean platform. Prices, fees and moving-average costs all sit in records the exchange already holds.

Visibility stops at the withdrawal address. The Financial Services Commission recorded 90 trillion won moving from exchanges to whitelisted overseas entities and personal wallets during the second half of 2025, up 14% on the previous six months.

A transfer to self-custody is not a sale. What follows it may leave no trace in any domestic exchange record, while the tax obligation on a Korean resident persists regardless of where the activity occurs.

Lawmakers pressed this point on July 29, arguing that taxation should wait until the OECD’s Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework is properly established. CARF is designed to exchange cross-border virtual-asset transaction data between countries automatically each year, which would give the National Tax Service visibility it currently lacks. Starting in 2027 means starting before that machinery is in place.

Pre-2027 Gains Are Largely Protected

Appreciation accumulated before the regime begins mostly escapes it.

For assets held before January 1, 2027, the acquisition cost becomes the higher of the original purchase price or the official market value on December 31, 2026.

Bitcoin bought at 30 million won and held while the year-end reference value reaches 80 million won enters the system with an 80 million won basis. A later sale at 90 million won produces a 10 million won taxable gain, not a 60 million won one.

That makes December 31 a date worth documenting carefully, along with evidence of original purchase costs.

What to Do Before January

The repeal bill remains in subcommittee, and this tax has been postponed three times before. Neither fact justifies waiting, because the preparation is identical whether the regime starts, shifts or dies.

Two questions decide how this lands. Whether lawmakers will enforce a low-exemption tax on a retail market large enough to swing elections is political, and the answer arrives before January. Whether ordinary users can calculate the liability accurately without professional help is operational, and on current evidence the answer is no.

The post South Korea’s 2027 Crypto Tax: What Traders Need to Know Now appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/south-koreas-crypto-tax-traders/

The post HYPE Slipped to $53 Support – Are Buyers Strong Enough to Hold? appeared first on Coindoo.

The token trades at $54 after reaching a daily low of $52.8, extending the weakness identified when our previous analysis flagged the loss of $57.

That placed HYPE roughly 0.6% above the support shelf near $52, where the price stabilized on June 11.

Futures and spot flows began moving differently as HYPE approached that level. Leveraged traders rapidly reduced exposure, while most of the latest spot demand appeared during the final four hours. The combination suggests that some buyers were willing to absorb supply near the lower end of the June range, although the amount remains too small to confirm a reversal.

Key Takeaways

Futures Traders Reversed Their Positioning

CoinGlass recorded $11.87 million in net futures outflows over the latest 12 hours. The eight-hour figure was even more negative at $13.4 million.

Since the shorter window contained a larger outflow, the earliest four hours of the 12-hour period must have produced approximately $1.53 million in net inflows.

Positioning then changed quickly. Futures recorded about $6.47 million in net outflows during the following four-hour block and another $6.93 million during the latest four hours.

Liquidation data shows that bullish traders absorbed most of the damage. Of the $3.49 million in HYPE positions liquidated over 24 hours, approximately $3.37 million came from longs.

The liquidations appear to have followed the price decline. Once they began, however, forced closures likely added pressure by automatically selling leveraged long positions into an already weakening market.

The figures show that traders initially increased leveraged exposure but began cutting positions aggressively when HYPE continued lower.

Spot Demand Strengthened Near Support

Spot activity developed differently.

HYPE recorded approximately $503,000 in net spot inflows over 12 hours. Around $458,000 arrived during the latest four hours, accounting for roughly 91% of the total.

The preceding four-hour block had recorded approximately $349,000 in net outflows. Buying therefore strengthened only after HYPE moved closer to the June support area.

This can make the market less vulnerable to another liquidation-driven move. Spot purchases do not carry the same forced-closing risk as leveraged futures positions, giving the price a more stable source of demand.

The inflow remains modest and has not pushed HYPE back above any major resistance. It does show, however, that buyers began responding near the bottom of the June range instead of allowing the decline to continue without resistance.

The regulated investment market didn’t provide any support.

SoSoValue data shows that HYPE spot ETFs recorded $8.78 million in net outflows on July 29, following another $1.24 million of withdrawals on July 28. Combined outflows reached $10.02 million across the two sessions.

ETF activity remains small compared with HYPE’s broader spot, onchain and derivatives markets, so these withdrawals were unlikely to be the main cause of the decline.

They still provide useful context. ETF investors were reducing exposure as HYPE approached support, leaving buyers in native crypto markets to defend the June floor.

READ MORE:

Stablecoins Could Change How European Banks Fund Loans

HYPE Is Testing the June Support Shelf

The daily low of $52.8 stopped slightly above the flat support near $52, keeping the June base intact for now.

A confirmed daily close below this area would break the consolidation floor and expose the 0.5 Fibonacci retracement near $51. If that level also fails, the deeper 0.618 retracement around $45 would become the next major support.

The first meaningful recovery test sits near $57, where the 0.382 Fibonacci retracement and the 100-day simple moving average are currently positioned. Since HYPE recently lost this area, buyers would need to establish daily price acceptance above it rather than produce only a brief intraday move.

The broader trend remains bearish. HYPE trades below its 50-day SMA around $64 and the 0.236 Fibonacci retracement near $65, while the descending sequence of July highs remains intact.

The late spot inflow could help stabilize HYPE above the June shelf, particularly if futures outflows begin to slow.

A relief bounce toward $57 is possible while support holds, but it would not change the broader downtrend. Reclaiming that area on a daily closing basis would provide the first sign that buyers can sustain demand beyond immediate support.

For now, the flow data points to possible stabilization rather than a confirmed reversal.

The post HYPE Slipped to $53 Support – Are Buyers Strong Enough to Hold? appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/hype-support-buyers-strong-enough-hold/

The post BlockDAG Claims and Staking Go Live in Hours While Bittensor TAO Price and Zilliqa Price Outlook Shift appeared first on Coindoo.

This publication is sponsored and written by a third party. Coindoo does not endorse or assume responsibility for the content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or any other materials on this page.

The crypto market is witnessing a sharp turn toward utility-driven architecture and refined network economics. Market participants are closely watching established assets recalibrate their economic designs to support long-term growth. Among these shifts, the Bittensor TAO price reflects significant structural updates to reward distribution, while market analysts continue reviewing the multi-year Zilliqa price outlook based on network adoption metrics.

At the same time, attention is moving toward BlockDAG (BDAG) as its operational transition reaches a key milestone. With token claims and native staking going live in a matter of hours, BlockDAG is moving from early structural preparation toward broader execution, changing how market participants evaluate current Layer 1 activity.

How v440 Driven Supply Dynamics Influence the Bittensor TAO Price

Bittensor’s v440 upgrade introduces the “Emission Gate,” fundamentally altering how rewards flow across its decentralized AI network. Rather than distributing tokens uniformly, the protocol now enforces a strict activity threshold, funneling roughly 87.5% of emissions directly into top-performing subnets. This update effectively removes passive yield for idle projects, pushing developers to continuously deliver real-world value.

For market participants reviewing the Bittensor TAO price, this dynamic represents a major evolution in network economics. By curbing token dilution from inactive subnets and concentrating rewards where actual demand exists, v440 reinforces the network’s financial efficiency. Although total supply issuance remains unchanged, prioritizing active contribution over passive holding strengthens core fundamentals, supporting longer-term sentiment around the Bittensor TAO price.

Technical Foundations and Macro Factors Driving the Zilliqa Price Outlook

Zilliqa continues to showcase its structural edge as a high-performance Layer 1 platform powered by sharding architecture and Scilla smart contracts. While recent ecosystem upgrades like Protofire’s Safe stack enhancement improve security and user experience, market participants are looking closely at how on-chain activity correlates with the long-term Zilliqa price outlook.

Despite a short-term 24-hour volume surge pushing ZIL to $0.00273, technical metrics signal a macro accumulation phase within its historical demand zone. Sustaining support above $0.00252 remains critical; breaking higher toward the $0.0050 mid-band could signal the start of a structural trend reversal.

However, with daily active accounts remaining muted below 500, a sustained breakout depends on network adoption keeping pace with technical improvements. For market participants evaluating the multi-year Zilliqa price outlook, transforming sharding speed into expanding user activity remains the key catalyst for long-term momentum.

BlockDAG’s $0.00000019 Entry Remains Active as Staking and Ecosystem Features Go Live

BlockDAG has opened a final campaign window to access BDAG tokens at $0.00000019 via Live Swap, offering a 22% discount compared to its CoinMarketCap valuation, according to the project. This limited setup arrives as token claims and native staking go live, enabling holders to participate in staking and interact directly across the expanding BlockDAG framework under the project’s stated terms.

This launch phase is backed by technical milestones. Network capability receives a major lift through upgraded Remote Procedure Call nodes designed to handle heavy transaction throughput. Physical miner shipments are actively rolling out, delivering hardware directly to network participants. Meanwhile, early staking participation shows community activity, complemented by a planned Priority Buyback program on September 1 under the project’s stated conditions.

For participants reviewing active crypto projects, timing remains part of the current discussion. Token claims have officially begun, unlocking utility across exchange listings, swap arbitrage opportunities, and the incoming Super App. Comprehensive answers covering exchange integrations, miner setup, and network architecture are available on the official FAQ page. With the discounted $0.00000019 price closing in a matter of hours, BlockDAG is transitioning from its presale stage into broader operational execution.

Key Takeaways

As tokenomics evolve across the market, attention is moving toward networks that pair technical capability with direct utility. Bittensor continues to refine its ecosystem incentives to support the Bittensor TAO price, while Zilliqa must bridge the gap between technical scaling and active user growth to validate its long-term Zilliqa price outlook.

In contrast, BlockDAG is being discussed for combining token claims, native staking, hardware deliveries, node upgrades, and a Live Swap campaign price. With token claims and native staking going live in hours, the project presents a different market setup as it moves toward open market operations.

Future outcomes will depend on eligibility, execution, liquidity, adoption, broader market conditions, and the project’s ability to complete its stated roadmap and program terms.

Aftersale: https://purchase.blockdag.network
Website: https://blockdag.network
Telegram: https://t.me/blockDAGnetworkOfficial
Discord: https://discord.gg/Q7BxghMVyu

This publication is sponsored and written by a third party. Coindoo does not endorse or assume responsibility for the content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or any other materials on this page. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research before engaging in any cryptocurrency-related actions. Coindoo will not be liable, directly or indirectly, for any damages or losses resulting from the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services mentioned.

The post BlockDAG Claims and Staking Go Live in Hours While Bittensor TAO Price and Zilliqa Price Outlook Shift appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/blockdag-claims-and-staking-go-live-in-hours-while-bittensor-tao-price-and-zilliqa-price-outlook-shift/

The post Open USD Adds Ethereum to Its Multichain Rollout appeared first on Coindoo.

The July 30 announcement from Ethereum Institutional confirms the network’s inclusion and highlights its role in the stablecoin’s business-focused settlement infrastructure.

As we previously reported, more than 140 companies have joined Open Standard, including Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, BlackRock and BNY. Under the proposed model, most reserve income would be shared with businesses that distribute and use the stablecoin instead of remaining entirely with a single issuer.

Why Ethereum Matters to Open USD

Ethereum offers payment companies a shared settlement network without placing the underlying ledger under the control of any one participant.

That matters when companies such as Visa, Mastercard and Stripe are expected to use the same infrastructure. Each can verify the asset and its settlement rules without relying on a private system operated by a direct competitor.

Ethereum also brings established liquidity, mature infrastructure and familiarity among institutional market participants. Other supported networks can then handle transfers where lower fees or faster execution matter more.

Breaking: Open USD will launch on @ethereum on day one.

Over 140 businesses, including Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, BlackRock and BNY. All reserve earnings flow to the partners that grow it.

A shared asset needs neutral ground.

We’re excited to be working with @openstandard on… pic.twitter.com/WF3ure6Dhb

— Ethereum Institutional (@ethereuminsti) July 30, 2026

Open USD Is Being Built for Business Use

Consumers may therefore use it without interacting with the stablecoin directly. A merchant, payroll platform or remittance service could settle through Open USD behind the scenes while customers continue paying and receiving funds in local currency.

Its business model is also different from those of USDT and USDC. Participating companies that help distribute Open USD are expected to receive a share of the reserve earnings. That could give exchanges, payment firms and fintech platforms a financial reason to integrate it, although ordinary token holders are not automatically entitled to yield.

READ MORE:

How to Convert USDT to USDC on OKX Europe: Step-by-Step Guide

Ethereum Fees Will Matter Most to Businesses

Ethereum transaction costs remain a practical consideration, especially for treasury desks, payment processors and other companies handling large volumes.

These firms can reduce costs by batching transfers, settling larger amounts less frequently or routing smaller transactions through cheaper supported networks. Ethereum is more likely to serve high-value settlement and liquidity needs than individual purchases at checkout.

Its inclusion from day one gives Open USD access to a major institutional market. Support for several networks broadens the stablecoin’s potential use across payments, trading and treasury operations without requiring all activity to pass through Ethereum mainnet.

The post Open USD Adds Ethereum to Its Multichain Rollout appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/open-usd-adds-ethereum-to-its-multichain-rollout/

The post BlockDAG, XRP, Solana, and Dogecoin Compared Across Current Crypto Market Trends appeared first on Coindoo.

This publication is sponsored and written by a third party. Coindoo does not endorse or assume responsibility for the content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or any other materials on this page.

Cryptocurrency regulations in the U.S. remain uncertain as lawmakers debate the Clarity Act in the Senate. However, even without clear government rules, the crypto market continues to show activity across projects with different use cases. BlockDAG, XRP, Solana, and Dogecoin remain visible through technology development, real-world use cases, and active communities.

Market analysts continue reviewing these digital assets as each one follows a different path. XRP is tied to cross-border payments and financial infrastructure. Solana focuses on fast blockchain performance and decentralized applications. Dogecoin remains one of the most recognizable community-driven assets. BlockDAG is moving through claims, staking, miner shipments, and ecosystem updates. Here is how these four projects compare.

1. BlockDAG (BDAG): Staking Rewards and 22% Discounted Entry Price

BlockDAG (BDAG) is approaching a major milestone as Claims and Staking for Batches 1–6 are scheduled to begin in just a few hours. Before that update goes live, BDAG remains available at the campaign price of $0.00000019 under the project’s stated terms. Purchases also qualify for the October 1 Priority Buyback option under the project’s stated conditions.

Once Claims and Staking go live, holders will be able to claim their BDAG, stake their coins under the project’s reward structure, and participate in the growing BlockDAG ecosystem. The project is also making progress with miner shipments, network upgrades, improved RPC performance, and a growing mining community. Upcoming launches such as the Super App, exchange listings, and additional ecosystem features continue to build momentum as BlockDAG moves toward wider adoption.

This update marks a major step toward a more active BlockDAG ecosystem. With staking starting soon, claims opening, miners being shipped, and new features coming, BlockDAG remains one of the projects being closely watched in current crypto discussions.

2. XRP: Cross-Border Financial Network

Ripple’s established global operations give XRP strong international resilience. The company has expanded from cross-border payments into broader financial infrastructure, providing digital asset custody, stablecoins, treasury management, and prime brokerage services. Additionally, the XRP Ledger continues growing within real-world asset tokenization. Because Ripple already operates across international markets, U.S. regulatory delays may have a more limited impact on its wider expansion. These diverse enterprise services keep XRP relevant for long-term utility discussions.

However, market participants should note that ongoing regulatory scrutiny and debates over whether Ripple’s private company equity holds more value than the token itself remain key risks for XRP holders.

3. Solana (SOL): Fast Scalability with Institutional Adoption

Solana continues to experience mainstream adoption, driven by its high-speed throughput and low transaction fees. The platform gained substantial momentum following Morgan Stanley’s E*TRADE expansion, which introduced crypto trading, including Solana access, to approximately 8.7 million clients. Furthermore, strong developer activity supports a growing ecosystem of decentralized applications and financial products. These performance advantages keep SOL visible among scalable blockchain networks.

However, Solana still faces challenges regarding historical network outages and congestion issues, which could affect its long-term network reliability during periods of extreme market activity.

4. Dogecoin (DOGE): Meme Power and Community Strength

Dogecoin maintains its strong standing as one of the most recognizable meme cryptocurrencies, supported by a loyal global community. It often performs well during periods of renewed retail investor enthusiasm and can act as a barometer for speculative market cycles. Its widespread brand recognition and strong exchange liquidity help it stay relevant when retail activity increases.

However, Dogecoin lacks major technical development and broad real-world utility, leaving its price highly volatile and heavily reliant on social media attention rather than underlying fundamentals.

Wrapping Up

XRP, Solana, and Dogecoin each offer distinct advantages. XRP is connected to global payments and financial infrastructure. Solana provides fast transaction speeds and a large application ecosystem. Dogecoin remains a highly recognizable community-driven asset with strong liquidity.

BlockDAG presents a different setup, with Claims and Staking for Batches 1–6 going live, BDAG listed at $0.00000019 under the project’s campaign terms, and the October 1 Priority Buyback option included under stated conditions. Combined with miner shipments, improved RPC performance, planned exchange listings, and the upcoming Super App, BlockDAG remains active in current crypto market discussions.

Future outcomes will depend on eligibility, execution, liquidity, adoption, broader market conditions, regulatory developments, and each project’s ability to complete its stated roadmap or program terms.

This publication is sponsored and written by a third party. Coindoo does not endorse or assume responsibility for the content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or any other materials on this page. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research before engaging in any cryptocurrency-related actions. Coindoo will not be liable, directly or indirectly, for any damages or losses resulting from the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services mentioned.

The post BlockDAG, XRP, Solana, and Dogecoin Compared Across Current Crypto Market Trends appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/blockdag-xrp-solana-and-dogecoin-compared-across-current-crypto-market-trends/

The post Strategy’s Q2 Report: The $8 Billion Loss Might Not be the Problem appeared first on Coindoo.

That figure matters more than the quarterly headline, because it describes where the company actually stands rather than what one three-month window did to its income statement.

The income statement still produced striking numbers. According to Strategy’s July 30 filing with the SEC, the company recorded an $8.33 billion operating loss driven by an $8.32 billion fair-value writedown on its digital assets, an $8.22 billion net loss after other income and tax, and $8.62 billion attributable to common shareholders once $400.7 million in preferred dividends were deducted.

Key Takeaways

Two Different Deficits, and Why They Differ

The $9.01 billion and the $8.32 billion measure separate things, and conflating them produces confusion.

The larger figure is the cumulative gap between what Strategy paid for its Bitcoin across years of purchases and what those coins are worth today. The smaller one is how much the fair value moved during the three months of Q2 alone.

Accounting rules require Strategy to mark its Bitcoin to market each quarter and run the change through earnings. CoinGlass data puts BTC’s Q2 decline at 14.09%, following a 22.2% drop in Q1, and that quarterly move is what the $8.32 billion captures.

The mechanism runs both ways. In Q2 2025, a Bitcoin rally produced a $14.05 billion fair-value gain and $10.02 billion of net income. A $22 billion swing between two second quarters says nothing about Strategy’s software business and everything about how completely its earnings now track one asset.

What Reverses and What Does Not

Strategy still owns the coins behind the writedown. Should Bitcoin recover above $75,476, the portfolio deficit closes and future quarters record gains instead.

Two things survive that recovery.

The first is the historical record. The Q2 loss stays in Strategy’s financial statements permanently, affecting reported book value, ratios and any metric calculated from past earnings.

The second is anything the company sold along the way. Strategy disposed of roughly $218.4 million of Bitcoin during 2026 to help fund preferred dividends. Those coins are gone at the prices they fetched, and a later rally does not retrieve them.

That distinction is where “paper loss” stops being reassuring. Strategy need not realize the full quarterly writedown, and it does need cash while it waits.

The Obligations Do Not Wait for a Recovery

Strategy carried $6.71 billion in outstanding convertible debt at quarter-end, after repurchasing $1.5 billion of notes during the period. Preferred dividends and interest fall due on schedule regardless of what Bitcoin does.

Against that, the company reported $1.71 billion in cash and equivalents plus $736.1 million in short-term investments as of June 30, totaling roughly $2.45 billion.

A second, larger figure appears in the same disclosures and measures something else. Strategy’s designated USD Reserve stood at approximately $2.4 billion at quarter-end and had grown to $3.75 billion by July 26, reflecting capital raised after the reporting date. Management estimates that covers preferred dividends and interest for more than 2.1 years.

The reserve makes a forced liquidation during a short downturn unlikely. It does not remove the obligations, and it grows through the same capital raising that creates the risk in the next section.

The mNAV Problem Is Larger Than the Writedown

For common shareholders, the structural question is whether Strategy can keep raising capital in a way that increases the Bitcoin backing each share.

Strategy tracks mNAV, comparing enterprise value against the value of its Bitcoin reserve. The company cautions that this differs from traditional net asset value, though the ratio explains the model well enough.

When MSTR trades well above the value of its underlying Bitcoin, issuing new common shares and spending the proceeds on BTC raises Bitcoin per share for existing holders, because the shares sell for more than the coins they represent.

Narrow that gap and the arithmetic changes. Near an mNAV of 1.0, Strategy issues shares at roughly the value of the Bitcoin behind them. Below parity, issuing equity to buy Bitcoin reduces Bitcoin per share, since the share count grows faster than the holdings.

Strategy’s own disclosures acknowledge it: Bitcoin per share falls when assumed diluted shares increase faster than the company’s Bitcoin.

This is the trap the accounting discussion misses entirely. Bitcoin can recover fully while MSTR shareholders end up worse off, if enough shares were issued at a weak valuation during the drawdown. The flywheel needs two conditions, and only one of them is a rising Bitcoin price. The other is investors continuing to pay a markup for the vehicle.

What to Watch Instead of the Headline

The $8.22 billion net loss measures Strategy’s sensitivity to Bitcoin rather than its distance from insolvency. Five indicators say more:

MSTR is not a Bitcoin proxy. Common shareholders rank behind debt and preferred securities, absorb dilution from every capital raise, and depend on management sustaining the financial structure through a downturn of unknown length.

An investor who expects Bitcoin to appreciate over years can reasonably shrug at one quarter’s writedown. Strategy kept its coins, and the accounting that produced this loss produced $14 billion of income the last time BTC rallied.

The position being 14% underwater, the $218.4 million already sold, and the mNAV question are the durable facts. If Bitcoin recovers and the valuation holds, the writedown becomes a footnote. If BTC stays weak and MSTR loses its premium, financing and dilution do the real damage, and no recovery in the coin price reverses shares issued at the wrong moment.

The post Strategy’s Q2 Report: The $8 Billion Loss Might Not be the Problem appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/strategys-second-quarter-report-billion-loss-problem/

The post Crypto Coins to Watch: BlockDAG, Ethereum, XRP, and Solana Draw Market Attention appeared first on Coindoo.

This publication is sponsored and written by a third party. Coindoo does not endorse or assume responsibility for the content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or any other materials on this page.

Shift in trader sentiment often begins when network performance, technical boundaries, and price momentum converge across major digital assets. Rather than relying on single-asset hype, current market participants are closely monitoring structural developments and support levels to gauge overall direction.

As key resistance points test buyer endurance and new operational milestones emerge, projects across different sectors are taking center stage. Right now, BlockDAG, Ethereum, XRP, and Solana are drawing widespread attention as notable crypto projects navigating these shifts.

Each token presents a distinct set of market dynamics, ranging from ongoing price consolidation to significant mainnet throughput milestones. Read on to explore how these assets are performing and what their latest technical levels signal for the market.

1. BlockDAG Batch 1–6 Claims Open Tomorrow as Staking Activates

Timing matters, and BlockDAG’s latest technical results could not have landed at a better moment. A major RPC upgrade has pushed the network past 100,000 transactions in a single 24-hour period, with throughput now reaching up to 5,500 transactions per second.

These are live figures generated by a mainnet already carrying real traffic, not projections from a roadmap, and they help explain why BlockDAG keeps appearing among crypto projects worth tracking this week.

That technical strength arrives just as claims for Batches 1 through 6 prepare to open fully, with staking rewards switching on in the same 24-hour window. BDAG remains priced at $0.00000019 through this stretch under the project’s stated terms, backed by a live swap still running 22% below the CoinMarketCap price, according to the project.

With network performance holding firm under real usage, claims opening, and staking activating in parallel, BlockDAG (BDAG) continues strengthening its standing in current crypto discussions as the countdown reaches its final hours. The outlook heading into this stretch remains active, with one of the project’s most consequential days now just ahead.

2. Ethereum Price Holds Within Key Range

Ethereum price has been moving within the $1,850 to $1,960 range for several days. This pattern may continue unless ETH breaks above resistance or falls below support. The $1,850 level remains important, as a break below it could increase selling pressure toward $1,770. A move above $1,960 may improve the short-term outlook and create room for higher prices.

Technical indicators show mixed signals, with MACD showing some positive momentum while RSI remains neutral. Other indicators suggest buyers still need more strength. Ethereum remains one of the crypto coins watched by traders, but the next direction will likely depend on how price reacts around these key levels.

3. XRP Price Faces Further Downside Pressure

XRP price is trading near $1.055 after extending its recent decline. The token has moved below the previous support level of $1.069, which now acts as resistance. The next key support area is around $1.054. A break below this level could push XRP toward $1.028, while a recovery above $1.069 may improve the short-term outlook.

Technical indicators remain weak, with RSI showing strong selling pressure and MACD staying negative. Buyers need to defend current levels to prevent further losses. XRP continues to be among the crypto coins followed by market participants, but price movement will depend on whether demand returns near support.

4. Solana Price Remains Below Resistance Level

Solana price is trading near $73 and remains below the important resistance level of $73.69. A move above this area could improve the short-term outlook and allow SOL to test the $74.50 level. However, failure to break resistance may keep sellers in control. Technical indicators, including RSI, MACD, Ultimate Oscillator, and Bull/Bear Power, continue to show weakness.

These signals suggest buyers have not gained enough strength to change the current trend. Solana remains a popular name among crypto coins, but traders are waiting for clearer signals before expecting a stronger move. The next direction will depend on whether SOL can recover above key resistance levels.

Conclusion

Decentralized networks operate in an environment where technical execution and price discipline shape long-term durability. While Ethereum remains locked in its key range, XRP faces ongoing pressure near support, and Solana struggles to clear critical resistance, these established assets reflect a cautious broader market.

BlockDAG continues to stand out in current crypto discussions by pairing live mainnet throughput exceeding 5,500 transactions per second with major ecosystem rollouts. With claims opening and staking going live, BDAG maintains its campaign price of $0.00000019 under the project’s stated terms, establishing a technical foundation as its presale countdown nears completion.

This publication is sponsored and written by a third party. Coindoo does not endorse or assume responsibility for the content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or any other materials on this page. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research before engaging in any cryptocurrency-related actions. Coindoo will not be liable, directly or indirectly, for any damages or losses resulting from the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services mentioned.

The post Crypto Coins to Watch: BlockDAG, Ethereum, XRP, and Solana Draw Market Attention appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/crypto-coins-to-watch-blockdag-ethereum-xrp-and-solana-draw-market-attention/

The post Crypto Wallet Maker Issues Warning as 594 BTC Leaves 500 Addresses appeared first on Coindoo.

Key Takeaways

The company’s July 30 advisory tells users to treat a seed as potentially at risk if it was generated on an Mk3 running firmware 4.0.1, released in March 2021, or any version after it. The issue persists through 5.0.3, the last firmware to support the model.

Coinkite describes the notice as early analysis with a formal technical review to follow, and has published no explanation of the entropy failure, no count of affected devices and no figure for funds lost.

What Happened on Friday Morning

Between roughly 01:31 and 01:56 UTC, 594.48 BTC moved out of about 500 single-signature addresses. AnchorWatch chief executive Rob Hamilton, whose preliminary on-chain analysis followed reporting by Atlas 21, counted 1,324 unspent transaction outputs swept across 500 transactions inside a three-block window, blocks 960188 to 960191. Around 562 BTC was later consolidated into a single address.

At a Bitcoin price near $64,300, that came to approximately $38.3 million.

Hamilton’s early read was that wallet generation appeared to have suffered an entropy flaw somewhere along the way. Kevin Loaec of Wizardsardine, among the first to raise the alarm publicly, suggested a low-entropy random-number generator, possibly inside a software library.

Two details point toward seed generation rather than any single exchange or service. Every drained address was single-signature, and many had been dormant for years, with coins spanning 2021 to 2026, a range that tracks the age of the affected firmware closely.

Coinkite has not confirmed a link between the sweep and its advisory, and no definitive public evidence establishes one.

Whether You Are Affected Turns on One Word

The advisory targets seeds that were generated on an affected Mk3, rather than every wallet the device has touched.

Three conditions have to hold:

The second condition is where owners get stuck, because a Coldcard reports the firmware it is running now rather than what it ran years ago. What matters is the version in place when the wallet was first created, and that is unrelated to when the hardware was purchased. Anyone who generated a seed before March 2021 and never regenerated afterwards falls outside the stated range. Anyone who set up after that date, or who cannot reconstruct the sequence, should assume they are in scope until Coinkite’s review narrows it.

A seed generated elsewhere and imported into the Mk3 never used the device’s random-number generator, so the flaw does not reach it. Coinkite is direct about newer hardware: Mk4, Q and Mk5 are unaffected on current analysis, and the advisory recommends using one of them to create the replacement seed.

Moving the Seed to a Newer Device Does Nothing

New firmware fixes how future seeds are created and has no effect on words that already exist.

The seed is the source from which every private key and address in the wallet is derived. If the randomness behind it was weaker than intended, an attacker can search a far smaller range of possible seeds until one turns up controlling funded addresses. The words look random to their owner either way, because the weakness lives in how the device chose them rather than in how the finished phrase appears.

One reported case illustrates the point sharply. A Reddit user described funds drained from a wallet whose seed was generated on an Mk3 bought in May 2021, then restored onto an Mk4 in January 2026. The newer, unaffected device inherited the original words and with them the original weakness. That account is self-reported and establishes nothing about the wider sweep, though the mechanism it describes is exactly what Coinkite is warning about.

The remedy is a seed that was never generated by an affected device.

Before Anything Else, Check the Balance

Given what happened on Friday, an affected user should verify their funds are still present before planning a migration. An emptied wallet calls for incident response rather than a careful transfer.

Migrating With a Second Device

Coinkite stresses proceeding calmly, noting that a rushed migration can create more immediate risk than the flaw itself.

If the Mk3 Is Your Only Device

Coinkite offers two routes, both treated as interim rather than complete fixes.

The first applies a BIP-39 passphrase, meaning a separate secret added to the recovery words, not the Coldcard PIN. The PIN protects the device and leaves the underlying keys untouched, so it offers nothing here.

Read the official passphrase instructions first, then select `Passphrase` on the Mk3 and enter something long, random and unique. Never a quotation, a name, a familiar phrase or a reused password, and never typed into a computer, phone or website. Back it up exactly, stored separately from the seed words, because losing it means losing the funds.

Select `APPLY`, record the new wallet’s eight-digit fingerprint, then power the device off and back on, re-enter the passphrase and confirm the same fingerprint appears. Export the passphrase wallet to your coordinator, verify its receive address on the Mk3 screen, then power-cycle and sign in without the passphrase to reach the original wallet. Send a small test transaction, re-enter the passphrase, confirm the test arrived, and only then move the remainder.

Every passphrase produces a valid wallet, including one containing a typo. Verifying the fingerprint before each send is what catches that.

The Dice-Only Alternative

The second route sidesteps the device’s random-number generator entirely.

On an empty Mk3 running 4.1.9, selecting `Import Existing > Dice Rolls` and entering at least 99 independent rolls of a fair six-sided die creates a seed by hashing the roll sequence directly. Coinkite is specific that the ordinary `New Wallet` flow does not do this, so it must be the dice path.

This is an advanced procedure and Coinkite labels it as such. Running both seeds on one device means alternating between them safely: verify each written backup and fingerprint before erasing anything, verify a receive address for the dice wallet, restore and verify the original, and send a test transaction before moving the balance.

The roll sequence is key material. It should never be photographed, saved digitally or entered into a networked computer. The dice-roll documentation covers the method in full.

A Passphrase Buys Time Rather Than Safety

Coinkite’s early analysis puts funds behind a strong BIP-39 passphrase at minimal risk from this issue, because the passphrase derives a separate wallet from both the original seed and the added secret. Automated searching for wallets built directly from a weakened base seed will not reach it.

That aligns with what Friday’s sweep showed: every drained address was single-signature, each holding more than 0.15 BTC.

The underlying entropy flaw remains regardless. Those recovery words are still weaker than intended, and everything now depends on the strength and secrecy of one added phrase. The permanent fix is a new seed from an unaffected device.

What This Says About Hardware Wallets

Coinkite’s investigation continues, and the scope may shift when the formal review lands. Owners should follow the company’s own updates rather than screenshots, forwarded messages or any third-party service offering to test whether a phrase is vulnerable.

That last point deserves emphasis. A warning at this scale attracts phishing aimed at exactly the people most likely to act quickly. No legitimate tool asks for seed words, and no support form, website or recovery service should ever receive them.

The lesson here is narrower than “hardware wallets failed.” An offline device keeps a private key away from malware, which it did. What it cannot do is protect a seed that was already predictable at the moment it was created, and key generation is where the entire security model starts.

The post Crypto Wallet Maker Issues Warning as 594 BTC Leaves 500 Addresses appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/crypto-wallet-maker-issues-warning-btc/