The post Hunter Biden Plans to Launch a Meme Coin: When and Where? appeared first on Coindoo.

The Wall Street Journal reported that Hunter Biden plans to launch a meme coin called $LAPTOP on Base on September 9. Before traders can assess the project, they will need a published contract address, allocation wallets and rules for the proposed token distribution.

When and where is $LAPTOP expected to launch?

According to the Wall Street Journal, $LAPTOP is planned for September 9 on Base, Coinbase’s Ethereum layer-2 network. Deploying a token on Base does not mean Coinbase will list or endorse it; it identifies only the network on which the token would be issued.

Hunter Biden later confirmed the planned launch in an X post, saying that $LAPTOP is scheduled to go live on Base on September 9.

$LAPTOP

September 9 pic.twitter.com/QokgWLNxgL

— Hunter Biden (@HunterBiden) September 7, 2026

The Wall Street Journal report did not identify a contract address or a project-controlled verification channel. Those details will determine whether users can distinguish the reported token from copycats after launch.

The name comes from a political controversy

The reported name most likely refers to the Hunter Biden laptop controversy that became a major political issue during the 2020 campaign. The New York Post first published material it said came from a laptop associated with Hunter Biden, while a later Washington Post forensic review verified thousands of emails as authentic communications through cryptographic evidence.

For traders, the name is a political reference, not a substitute for launch disclosures. It does not reveal how the token will be distributed, priced or supported by liquidity.

What the report says about the supply

The Wall Street Journal said the project plans to issue one billion $LAPTOP tokens. Founders, including Hunter Biden, would hold 30% of the supply. Those tokens would reportedly be locked for six months and vest fully over two years.

The newspaper also reported that 20% of supply would be distributed in two batches to wallets belonging to people who lost money on the $TRUMP meme coin, subscribers to Hunter Biden’s Substack and recipients on a mailing list curated by video journalist Andrew Callaghan.

The proposed distribution needs rules before it can be assessed

The proposed distribution is unusual because eligibility appears to depend partly on past $TRUMP trading losses. That cannot be evaluated without a stated method for measuring those losses, a wallet snapshot date, claim limits and safeguards against duplicate or automated claims.

It may bring an established political-meme-coin audience to the launch, but a distribution is not compensation merely because it targets previous token holders. The value, timing and terms of the tokens received would matter as much as eligibility.

Allocation percentages do not show the whole market structure

A reported 30% founder allocation does not by itself show how much supply will be available to trade. The practical questions are how much is circulating, how the lock is enforced, which wallets receive the tokens and how much liquidity exists when trading starts.

The published documents behind $TRUMP illustrate why a headline allocation is only the starting point. Website operations, token custody, unlocks and trading revenue can sit with different entities. $LAPTOP traders will need similar visibility into who controls the reported founder allocation and how its release schedule works.

READ MORE:

DBS and Citi Test 24/7 Tokenized USD Payments

A ticker is not a contract

Names and tickers are not unique on public blockchains. Coinbase already displays a pre-existing Base asset page using the “Hunter Biden’s Laptop” name and $LAPTOP ticker, with no stated connection to the reported September 9 launch. Coinbase also says that asset is not tradable on its platform and that the information comes from third-party sources.

Users should wait for the launch team to publish an official contract address through a verifiable channel. That address should then be checked on a Base block explorer against the announced supply, allocation wallets, contract verification status and liquidity pool.

Political token launches face closer scrutiny

The planned launch arrives while political crypto ventures are already under greater ethical scrutiny. Donald Trump’s disclosed memecoin income has renewed calls for restrictions on public officials issuing tokens.

Because Hunter Biden does not hold public office, the reported $LAPTOP launch differs from a token tied to a sitting official. It would still add another prominent U.S. political name to a market where token allocations, brand licensing and financial interests are receiving more attention.

The first useful test will come after launch: whether the team publishes a verifiable contract, visible allocation wallets and clear distribution rules. Until then, $LAPTOP remains a reported launch plan, not a token that can be assessed from its ticker or political branding.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

The post Hunter Biden Plans to Launch a Meme Coin: When and Where? appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/hunter-biden-launch-meme-coin/

The post Chainlink Price About to Cool Down? Warning Signs Start Flashing appeared first on Coindoo.

Chainlink’s rally has stalled near its recent high. LINK climbed from a June low near $6.95 to almost $13.70 before retreating toward $12.8. The rejection coincided with signals flagged by Ali Charts: a weekly exhaustion reading, higher exchange balances and less large-holder activity.

LINK had already regained momentum in mid-August, when it reclaimed its major moving averages and put $10 back in view. Its advance also coincided with a wider recovery across large-cap crypto, so no single Chainlink development or on-chain signal can explain the full move.

LINK has reached the high of its current move

The $13.70 area is the high of LINK’s advance from the June low near $6.95. Buyers need to reclaim and hold above it to show that the latest rejection was temporary rather than the start of a larger pullback.

LINK still trades above its 50-, 100- and 200-day moving averages, clustered between roughly $8.85 and $9.78. That leaves the broader recovery intact. The immediate question is whether buyers can defend the first support created by the breakout.

Three signals point to a less convincing rally

Ali Charts highlighted a weekly TD Sequential nine after LINK’s roughly 97% rise from the June low. The indicator is used to identify a trend that may be becoming exhausted. It does not predict the size of a correction, or guarantee that one will follow, but the reading carries more weight after such a sharp advance.

Ali also cited Santiment data showing exchange balances rising by about 1.75 million LINK, from roughly 269.25 million to 271 million tokens. At prices near $12.88, that represents close to $23 million in LINK. The figure measures the stock of tokens held on exchanges, not whether those tokens have been sold.

Large transactions worth more than $1 million reportedly fell from around 59 two weeks ago to about 10. That points to less activity from major holders as LINK approaches resistance. It is not enough to call the move distribution, since a lower transaction count can also mean large holders are waiting for a clearer direction.

Netflows show LINK moving onto exchanges

Exchange balances show how much LINK is already held on trading venues. CryptoQuant’s daily netflow data show whether those balances are still growing through recent transfers.

LINK recorded a positive netflow of roughly 780,000 tokens on September 1, followed by smaller positive readings through September 6. That is consistent with more LINK reaching exchanges while price was testing the high. It still does not establish that those tokens were sold: transfers can also reflect market-making, collateral movements or custody arrangements.

CryptoQuant’s exchange reserve measured in dollars rose to roughly $1.6 billion from around $1 billion in early August. That should not be counted as separate evidence of token inflows. LINK’s own price rose sharply over the same period, so the dollar value of reserves can increase even when the number of tokens on exchanges does not.

Network adoption has continued during the rally

The exchange data describe short-term supply. Circle’s addition of Chainlink Proof of Reserve to cirBTC is a separate part of the picture, giving users a way to monitor the token’s disclosed Bitcoin reserves onchain. It supports Chainlink’s infrastructure case, but it does not show whether spot demand will defend $12.25.

LINK’s setup is also not isolated from the rest of the market. The token rose during a broader rebound in major cryptocurrencies. A fresh Bitcoin-led sell-off could therefore test LINK’s support even if Chainlink’s adoption outlook remains unchanged.

$12.25 decides whether this is a pause or a cooldown

The warning case rests on a weekly TD Sequential nine, a higher LINK balance on exchanges and several days of positive exchange netflows. The reported drop in transactions above $1 million also suggests that the rally is attracting less activity from major holders near resistance.

Holding above $12.25 would leave LINK in position to retest $13.70. A sustained move through the recent high would show that the rejection was only a pause in the recovery.

The bearish case becomes stronger if LINK loses $12.25 while exchange netflows remain positive. That combination would show a failed support level alongside a larger supply of tokens reaching exchanges, putting $11.1 and then $10.3 in focus.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

The post Chainlink Price About to Cool Down? Warning Signs Start Flashing appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/chainlink-price-cool-down-warning-signs-start-flashing/

The post Solana Price Analysis September: Death Cross on the Horizon appeared first on Coindoo.

Key Takeaways

The rebound follows Solana’s August rally, when SOL briefly reached $110, its high for the month. The weekly chart now shifts attention to $105, the first resistance zone the recovery must clear.

$105 is a resistance cluster, not a single price

The 23.6% Fibonacci retracement sits at $105, close to the descending trendline and the 50-week simple moving average. Together, those levels form the first major resistance zone for SOL’s recovery.

A one-day move above that area would not change the weekly structure. SOL needs to close above $105 and hold the level after a retest before the market can treat it as support. Until then, the recovery remains a challenge to the downtrend.

RSI shows that selling pressure weakened

SOL made a lower price low during the decline into June, while its weekly RSI made a higher low. That mismatch is known as a bullish divergence: price continued to fall, but the momentum behind the sell-off weakened. It suggests that sellers were losing control into the June bottom.

That becomes more meaningful only if price follows through. A sustained weekly move above $105 would show that buyers are responding to the improvement in momentum; another rejection there would leave the divergence in place without confirming a reversal.

The death cross is already in place

The 50-week moving average has fallen below the 200-week average, creating the death-cross condition. Traders watch it because it shows the shorter-term trend has weakened below the longer-term trend, even though the crossover itself is a lagging indicator rather than a forecast for the next weekly candle.

The 50-week and 200-week averages are converging around $105, making that zone more important. The 100-week average sits in the mid-$140s, adding another barrier if SOL recovers beyond the first retracement.

Stablecoin supply rose, but trading volume fell

DeFiLlama puts Solana’s stablecoin market cap at about $16.42 billion as of writing, up 5.05% over seven days. The figure covers stablecoins circulating across the network, including balances in wallets and DeFi applications.

That matters because those stablecoins can be used to buy SOL on Solana-based exchanges or posted as collateral on onchain perpetual platforms. A larger stablecoin balance expands the pool of dollar-denominated capital available on the network, but it does not show how much is actively sitting in SOL trading pools, order books or derivatives margin.

So far, trading activity has not confirmed a broad expansion in demand. Solana’s seven-day DEX volume was down 11.02%, while perpetual-futures volume fell 5.78%. A recovery above $105 would carry more weight if turnover starts rising alongside the stablecoin balance, showing that more of that capital is entering SOL markets rather than remaining in wallets, lending protocols or payment balances.

Recent network use remains relevant – Solana fees reached record levels earlier this month, but fee growth alone does not determine the weekly chart trend.

READ MORE:

Chainlink Price About to Cool Down? Warning Signs Start Flashing

Payment Channels show where that liquidity could be used

Growing stablecoin liquidity becomes more relevant when applications give users a reason to move it. On September 3, the Solana Foundation introduced Payment Channels, which allow users or software agents to authorize a spending limit once, exchange signed payment updates offchain and settle the final balance onchain.

The Foundation said a proxy test involving 100,000 wallets issued more than one million payment updates per second. The figure does not describe Solana’s base-layer throughput: the payment updates are aggregated, and only final settlements reach the chain.

The price connection is indirect, but sustained adoption could matter for SOL’s economics. Each final settlement on Solana requires transaction fees paid in SOL, and half of every base fee is burned. If Payment Channels lead to more channel openings, settlements and other onchain activity, they could increase SOL-denominated fee demand while reducing circulating supply through the burn mechanism. That could potentially support the token only if usage becomes large and persistent; the test itself is not evidence of new SOL buying.

SOL now needs to turn $105 into support

For the recovery to gain technical credibility, SOL needs a weekly close above $105, followed by a move through $134. That would show that buyers have cleared the first Fibonacci barrier and begun to recover the damaged moving-average structure.

A rejection below $105 would keep SOL under the falling trendline and preserve the broader weekly downtrend. The RSI divergence would still show that sellers lost momentum into June, but buyers would need more evidence before the market could call the move a durable reversal.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

The post Solana Price Analysis September: Death Cross on the Horizon appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/solana-price-analysis-september-death-cross-on-the-horizon/

The post Charles Hoskinson Net Worth: How Rich is Cardano’s Founder in 2026? appeared first on Coindoo.

He co-founded Ethereum, walked away from it, and then built Cardano into a top-20 blockchain, all while pouring money into bison ranches, longevity medicine and de-extinction biotech in rural Wyoming. His fortune is real, large and almost entirely illiquid, tied up in a token he refuses to sell and a private engineering firm whose books stay closed. Pinning it down means separating what he holds from what he says he holds, and both have moved hard over the past year.

From Ethereum exile to Cardano’s architect

Born in Hawaii in 1987, Hoskinson studied mathematics in Colorado before dropping into crypto early, first as a Bitcoin miner and educator. In 2013 he became one of the original co-founders of Ethereum and briefly served as its first chief executive, until a split with Vitalik Buterin over whether the project should run as a company or a nonprofit ended with his removal in 2014. He lost that argument and the platform, then built a rival. In 2015 he founded Input Output Hong Kong, now Input Output Global, and in 2017 launched Cardano as a blockchain where every protocol change is supposed to pass peer review before it ships. That academic streak defines both the network and the man, and it is the reason his wealth sits inside a single ecosystem rather than spread across a diversified book.

The ADA he won’t sell, and everything else on-chain

Most of Hoskinson’s money is in cryptocurrency, and most of that is in the token he created. He has said he ranks among the single largest individual holders of ADA and that he has not sold a single one since 2017, a position he keeps to stay aligned with the network. He will not disclose wallet addresses or a count, so the exact size stays a black box. The scale shows up indirectly through his losses instead.

The size of that exposure became public when the market turned. Speaking from Tokyo in February 2026, Hoskinson said his personal crypto holdings were down more than $3 billion in paper value and that he had no intention of liquidating. He framed the disclosure as a rebuttal to the idea that founders are insulated from the pain that hits retail. A month earlier he had put the four-year figure at roughly $2.5 billion in an interview with Scott Melker. A $3 billion swing is only possible if the underlying stack ran into the billions at its peak, which tells you more about the true scale of his ADA than any figure he has volunteered.

A word on that $3 billion, because the wording matters. An unrealized loss exists only on paper and turns real the moment a holder sells. Hoskinson has not sold, so the number measures how far his position has fallen from its high, not cash that left his accounts. That distinction is the whole reason he can claim a billion-dollar net worth and a multibillion-dollar loss in the same breath.

Beyond the blockchain: the businesses Hoskinson bankrolls

Hoskinson runs his empire through two engines: Input Output Global, the firm that builds Cardano, and the Hoskinson Family Office, his private investment wing. Around those sit a cluster of physical ventures in Wyoming that look less like a portfolio and more like a set of personal convictions with a bank account attached. Several of them lost money heavily in 2026, and the way he handled those losses says as much about his balance sheet as any token holding.

Input Output Global: the engine behind Cardano

IOG, formerly IOHK, is the commercial heart of the operation. Hoskinson founded it and holds the majority stake, and it holds the enterprise contracts and digital-asset treasuries that anchor his more stable wealth. It is also increasingly exposed to Cardano’s new on-chain governance. Under the network’s decentralized treasury, IOG has had to request funding directly from ADA holders rather than command it.

• Founder and majority owner; the primary firm contracted to build and maintain Cardano.
• Filed a 2026 development funding request of $46.8 million, down from $97.5 million in 2025; delegates approved core items while pushing back on its wider research package.
• Hoskinson has warned that a failed vote could force staff cuts and the closure of its research lab.
• Third-party aggregators loosely estimate baseline annual service revenue near $11.9 million, a figure IOG has not confirmed.

Midnight: the privacy bet incubated inside IOG

Midnight is a standalone blockchain built under the IOG umbrella, aimed at programmable privacy and data protection. It is early-stage and pre-revenue, but Hoskinson has repeatedly named it alongside Cardano as his central focus, which makes it a strategic asset rather than a cash one.

• Positioned as a data-protection and rational-privacy layer.
• In active development; no independent valuation exists.
• One of the two projects Hoskinson said he is now fully focused on.

The “Mayo Clinic of the West” that ran out of cash

The Hoskinson Health and Wellness Clinic in Gillette was the most ambitious and most expensive of the real-world ventures. It opened in 2022 with the goal of bringing advanced specialty care to rural Wyoming, and it never turned a profit. His brother and clinic co-founder William Hoskinson said Charles had spent nearly $250 million on infrastructure, salaries and local investment and had received not a single penny of reimbursement.

• Cut around 40 positions in January 2026 after admitting it grew too fast.
• Announced in May that it would close on July 31, citing multi-million-dollar losses.
• In June the family said it was in advanced talks to sell to a large hospital chain to preserve care.

Bison, concrete and the Wyoming build-out

Supporting the clinic and the ranch was a set of local operating companies, and they proved to be the weakest link. The construction and concrete firms were created mainly to build the clinic, never became profitable, and were wound down to stop the cash bleeding. The ranch itself is a long-horizon asset rather than an income stream.

• An 11,000-acre bison ranch in Wyoming supporting up to 600 animals.
• Hoskinson Contracting and Concrete laid off a combined 136 workers in December 2025.
• Heavy overhead for land, wildlife management and agricultural technology keeps the ranch capital-intensive.

W3i Software and the USDM stablecoin

Through the Hoskinson Family Office, he has taken equity in outside ventures that feed back into the Cardano thesis. The clearest is W3i Software, the developer behind USDM, Cardano’s first regulated fiat-backed stablecoin.

• The Family Office deployed a $1.5 million strategic investment into the firm.
• The stake supports MiCA-compliant stablecoin infrastructure tied to Cardano’s regulated DeFi push.

Colossal Biosciences and the woolly mammoth

The most eye-catching bet is Colossal Biosciences, the genetic de-extinction startup working on species like the woolly mammoth and the dire wolf. It carries a multibillion-dollar private valuation but almost no revenue, which makes it a pure research position rather than a wealth generator.

• Equity stake in a heavily venture-backed biotech firm.
• Negligible revenue; value sits entirely in long-term genetic intellectual property.

READ MORE:

5 Things You Should Know Before Trading Crypto

From a $62 million raise to an $8 billion network

Because Hoskinson’s fortune tracks ADA, the token’s own trajectory is the single most useful gauge of his wealth. Cardano launched in 2017 after an ICO that raised roughly $62 million at an initial price around $0.0024. It climbed to an all-time high of $3.10 on September 2, 2021, then spent the following years grinding down. In June 2026 it slipped below 20 cents to a four-year low, and it now trades near $0.22 for a market capitalization around $8.2 billion, which keeps it inside the top 20 by size. That is roughly 93% below its peak.

The network kept shipping even as the price fell. Cardano activated its Van Rossem hard fork in July 2026, lowering smart contract costs and opening the door to community-led upgrades, and IOG announced that core development would shift toward external teams as part of a decentralization push. Not every signal was positive. Grayscale dropped its plans for Cardano exchange-traded funds in August 2026, and critics have kept up the “ghost chain” charge over the gap between the network’s valuation and its on-chain usage. For Hoskinson, every one of these developments is also a personal balance-sheet event.

So how much is Charles Hoskinson worth?

The honest answer is that no confirmed figure exists, and the range is wide. Hoskinson has given his own estimate of roughly $1.2 billion, a number he repeated to DL News and has not walked back, and he frames that capital as what lets him fund unconventional projects. Independent trackers are more conservative. Most 2026 estimates cluster between $600 million and $800 million, though Traders Union’s model lands close to his own $1.2 billion. Forbes first put him at $500 million to $600 million back in 2018. During the 2021 peak, when ADA was near its record, his on-paper wealth would have topped $4 billion.

Take the midpoint and Hoskinson is comfortably a billionaire on his own accounting and a near-billionaire on everyone else’s, with the gap explained by how much credit you give to assets that live in private wallets and private companies. The bigger point sits underneath the number. He has spent the past year retreating from the physical ventures that drained hundreds of millions, closing companies, laying off staff and preparing to hand off the clinic. What is left is a fortune deliberately concentrated on two things he controls and refuses to trim: his ADA and the firm that builds Cardano. That concentration is a choice, and its payoff now depends on a governance vote in Cardano’s treasury and a token that would need to multiply several times over just to get back to where his paper wealth stood five years ago.

The post Charles Hoskinson Net Worth: How Rich is Cardano’s Founder in 2026? appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/charles-hoskinson-net-worth/

The post HYPE Price Holds Channel as RSI Diverges: Levels to Watch appeared first on Coindoo.

Key Takeaways

HYPE’s uptrend holds while momentum weakens

HYPE traded near $83.5 on September 8 after falling as low as $81.5, leaving price close to the lower boundary of its daily ascending channel.

After rallying from the $50.5 swing low, HYPE began consolidating inside the channel above $75. The structure continued producing higher highs, including the recent move to $89.

RSI moved in the opposite direction. Price recorded higher highs while the indicator formed lower highs, creating a bearish divergence. With daily RSI at 59.39 and still above the neutral 50 line, the pattern shows weaker bullish momentum rather than a confirmed reversal.

The channel remains intact, so price has not yet confirmed the RSI warning. That would begin to change if HYPE closes below the lower trendline and starts forming lower lows.

$83 support meets the first resistance at $84.5

The four-hour chart places HYPE between two moving averages. Price near $83.7 was below the 50-period SMA close to $84.5 but remained above the 100-period SMA at $83

The 50-SMA had previously supported the advance and now forms the first recovery test. HYPE needs to reclaim $84.5 and hold above it on subsequent four-hour candles before the average begins acting as resistance.

Below the market, the 100-SMA coincides with the ascending channel’s lower trendline near $83. An intraday wick below the area would not confirm a breakdown; a four-hour close below both the channel and the 100-SMA would carry more weight.

Four-hour RSI had fallen to 43.23, below both the neutral 50 line and its moving average at 51.43. That confirms weaker short-term momentum, although the indicator has not reached oversold territory.

$80.5 might be separating consolidation from a deeper pullback

Holding $80.5 would keep HYPE within a relatively shallow retracement of its advance, even if the four-hour structure weakens. A daily close below it would remove the first fixed support beneath the channel and expose lower Fibonacci and moving-average levels.

The $70-$72 area would become particularly relevant during a deeper correction because the four-hour 200-SMA at $71.6 sits close to the 50% Fibonacci retracement at $70.20.

Derivatives dominate HYPE trading

CoinGlass showed approximately $3.37 billion in aggregated HYPE futures open interest on September 8. Over the same 24-hour period, futures volume reached about $2.35 billion, compared with approximately $160 million in spot volume. Futures turnover was therefore around 14.6 times larger than spot trading.

Open interest measures the value of derivatives positions that remain outstanding, while volume shows how much trading occurred during the period. Together, the figures indicate that most HYPE trading activity is taking place through derivatives rather than direct spot purchases.

That distinction matters near an important support area because leveraged positions can be closed voluntarily or forced out through liquidations, potentially accelerating a move once price breaks a widely watched level. Open interest does not show whether traders are predominantly bullish or bearish, however, because every futures contract has both a long and a short side.

CoinGlass recorded approximately $4.48 million in HYPE liquidations over 24 hours, equivalent to roughly 0.13% of reported open interest. The relatively small figure does not indicate that the market had already undergone broad forced deleveraging. A large pool of open derivatives exposure therefore remained in place as HYPE tested support.

Protocol fees create a separate source of HYPE demand

The derivatives data explains why a technical breakdown could become volatile. Hyperliquid’s fee mechanism addresses a different question: whether activity on the protocol creates recurring demand for HYPE itself.

Hyperliquid says 99% of relevant protocol revenue is directed to the Assistance Fund. The fund automatically uses that revenue to purchase HYPE, and the acquired tokens are burned. The mechanism therefore links eligible trading fees to recurring token purchases and a reduction in supply.

DeFiLlama recorded approximately $201.83 million in gross protocol revenue during Q2 2026. That total should not be treated as the amount used to purchase HYPE. Builder fees and other excluded revenue are not fully directed to the Assistance Fund, so gross revenue is larger than the sum available for token purchases.

The fee mechanism can support HYPE’s longer-term token economics, but it does not establish a price floor or prevent corrections. The token demonstrated that distinction when it pulled back after it reached a new high near $90. The buy-and-burn system is a structural source of demand, not a signal that determines when traders should enter or exit a position.

HYPE’s next breakout needs more than a higher price

The bearish RSI divergence is a warning, not a sell signal by itself. The bullish case would strengthen if HYPE holds its ascending channel, reclaims the four-hour 50-SMA and eventually clears $89.7 while daily RSI forms a higher high. That combination would show that momentum is catching up with price.

Repeated failures below the four-hour 50-SMA would point to a weaker recovery. A four-hour close below the channel and 100-SMA would provide the first evidence of a breakdown, while a daily close below $80.5 would confirm broader structural damage. Either move would carry more significance if accompanied by rising trading volume rather than a brief intraday wick.

Investors should also monitor whether spot demand begins catching up with futures activity. A rally supported by increasing spot volume would be less dependent on leveraged positions. If open interest rises sharply while spot volume remains weak, the market could become more vulnerable to liquidations during a reversal. Falling price combined with declining open interest and increasing liquidations would indicate that leveraged positions are being forced out.

For a longer-term view, protocol revenue and Assistance Fund purchases are more useful when tracked over several months rather than individual trading sessions. Until price, RSI, volume and spot participation begin pointing in the same direction, HYPE’s uptrend remains intact but its next breakout is not yet confirmed.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

The post HYPE Price Holds Channel as RSI Diverges: Levels to Watch appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/hype-price-holds-channel-levels-to-watch/

The post Crypto Market Faces Two Risks as September Begins – Yields and Yen Warnings appeared first on Coindoo.

Key Takeaways

September opens with a controlled pullback

Bitcoin traded at approximately $77,500 at 19:50 UTC on September 1, down 1.45% over 24 hours, according to CoinMarketCap. The CMC20 index declined 1.11% over the same period, placing Bitcoin’s move inside a broader but still contained market pullback.

Among the leading cryptocurrencies tracked at the time, Monero posted the steepest daily loss, falling 3.6% to $502. TRON dropped 2.8% to $0.32, Solana lost 1.6% to $101 and Ethereum declined 1.5% to $2,430. Monero nevertheless remained almost 13% higher over seven days, while Solana retained a weekly gain of 2.6%. Their daily losses therefore followed recent strength rather than extending a weeklong sell-off.

The losses were broad enough to show weaker risk appetite, but not severe enough to establish that investors were rushing out of crypto. The crypto pullback coincided with a sharper repricing in oil and government bonds, where the potential consequences extended beyond a single trading session.

Oil and Fed expectations push yields higher

Reuters reported that the US 10-year Treasury yield reached 4.80% before easing toward 4.77%, while Brent crude moved above $92 per barrel. The geopolitical pressure intensified later in the session when The Guardian reported that US forces had begun striking IRGC targets after the US military accused Iran of attempting attacks against commercial shipping and American personnel in the region. Further disruption around the strait could keep oil prices elevated and make inflation more difficult for central banks to contain.

The Federal Reserve reinforced that concern on September 1. Governor Michael Barr said inflation remained too high and argued that policymakers should raise rates decisively if price growth failed to moderate sufficiently. Interest-rate futures placed the probability of a September increase near 68%, according to Reuters.

That combination creates a direct valuation problem for crypto. Higher Treasury yields improve the return available from lower-risk assets while raising the cost of financing leveraged positions. Bitcoin does not need to experience a wave of bond-driven selling for those conditions to matter; investors are being offered more compensation for holding cash and government debt at the same time that speculative exposure is becoming more expensive.

Rates also explain why Japan cannot be treated as a separate currency footnote. The yen finances carry trades across global markets, while rising Japanese yields can make those positions more expensive to maintain. The speed and method of any policy response therefore matter more than the exchange rate alone.

READ MORE:

Binance Adds 1,000 Stock Options With a Key Expiry Rule

The yen threat is a reversal, not weakness itself

The yen’s slide toward 160 per dollar is not automatically bearish for Bitcoin. Japan’s historically low borrowing costs have allowed investors to borrow in yen and place that capital into assets offering higher potential returns. A weak currency can keep that strategy attractive as long as financing remains inexpensive and the exchange rate moves gradually.

The risk begins when the yen strengthens quickly or Japanese borrowing costs rise far enough to undermine those positions. Investors may then need to sell assets elsewhere, repurchase yen and repay their funding, allowing pressure that begins in Japan to reach equities, bonds and crypto.

That possibility returned to view after Japan’s 10-year government-bond yield touched 3% for the first time since 1996. Following an August 31 meeting, Japan’s Ministry of Finance said Japanese and US officials had reaffirmed that an orderly yen market was essential for global financial stability and that their joint efforts would continue.

The wording signals closer scrutiny, but it does not confirm another intervention. A gradual stabilization would give leveraged investors time to adjust, whereas a sharp reversal caused by intervention or higher Bank of Japan rates could force positions to close much faster. The funding method matters as well. That distinction shaped our earlier examination of Arthur Hayes’ yen thesis for Bitcoin, which showed why supporting the currency through liquidity facilities could produce different consequences from an aggressive BOJ tightening cycle.

Nothing in the September 1 crypto move proves that such an unwind has started. Evidence would require more than a weak trading session: the yen would need to appreciate rapidly as losses spread across leveraged markets and Bitcoin weakened alongside other risk assets. Until those conditions appear together, the currency remains a credible vulnerability rather than the established cause of the current decline.

Bitcoin still has room above $76,000

Bitcoin’s decline pushed it below $78,000 but left it above the first visible support area around $76,000. The daily BTC chart places the next deeper reference near $72,400, while the recent $80,000–$81,000 highs remain the barrier buyers must clear.

A daily close below $76,000 would show that the pullback is reaching beyond the opening reaction to higher yields. Reclaiming $80,000 would instead indicate that buyers absorbed the macro pressure. Until either boundary breaks on a daily closing basis, Bitcoin remains under pressure without confirming a larger trend change.

September’s opening move is still a rates story

As of time of writing the market is probably reacting to higher yields and a less favorable Federal Reserve outlook, while the yen remains a conditional risk. A sudden currency reversal accompanied by a Bitcoin close below $76,000 might be the first sign that those two pressures were beginning to reinforce each other.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice.

The post Crypto Market Faces Two Risks as September Begins – Yields and Yen Warnings appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/crypto-market-faces-two-risks-as-september-begins-yields-and-yen-warnings/

The post XRP Price Slips Toward $1.32 Even as ETFs Add $14M appeared first on Coindoo.

Key Takeaways

ETF buyers arrived, but price did not follow

US spot XRP ETFs recorded $14.38 million in net inflows on September 1, according to SoSoValue. Franklin’s XRPZ led the session with $6.63 million, followed by $4.72 million for Grayscale’s GXRP.

Cumulative net inflows reached approximately $1.68 billion, while the products’ combined net assets stood at $1.44 billion after the session. The regulated funds therefore continued attracting capital during XRP’s correction.

XRP did not rise alongside the reported inflows, showing that ETF demand had not yet translated into a broader price recovery. The token had gained nearly 70% during its August advance, giving recent buyers a substantial profit cushion and creating one plausible source of selling.

XRP was not declining in isolation. Its pullback extended a wider crypto-market retreat that began on September 1 as higher Treasury yields and renewed concerns about the yen weighed on risk assets. Coindoo’s report on the two macro risks facing the crypto market explains why several large cryptocurrencies moved lower together. That wider pressure makes it difficult to attribute XRP’s decline to events like Ripple’s escrow activity alone.

Ripple’s 1 billion XRP unlock was not a sell order

Ripple’s scheduled September escrow release consisted of three transactions containing 500 million, 400 million and 100 million XRP. Later that day, a report citing XRPL transaction data showed the company creating new escrows for 500 million and 200 million tokens, returning 700 million XRP to time-locked accounts.

The sequence left 300 million XRP outside the newly created escrows. That amount became available to Ripple, but no cited transaction shows the entire balance moving to an exchange or entering public-market circulation.

Ripple’s explanation of the escrow system describes the monthly 1 billion XRP release as an upper limit on possible new supply rather than the amount automatically entering circulation. Tokens that remain unused can be placed into new escrows with later release dates.

The $14.38 million ETF inflow also cannot be measured directly against the roughly $405 million nominal value of the 300 million XRP remaining outside escrow at a price of $1.35. The ETF figure represents capital that entered the funds during one trading day. The larger number represents company-controlled inventory that has not been shown entering the public market.

XRP returns to the base of its August range

XRP has worked its way lower inside a daily descending channel since its August rally failed near $1.70. Selling volume has remained well below the levels recorded during the advance, so the pullback still lacks the force of a high-volume breakdown.

The failed breakout discussed in our August 29 analysis has since developed into a steady sequence of lower highs. XRP fell to $1.3265 on September 2 before recovering toward $1.35, marking its lowest price since the August peak. The wick stopped above the channel’s lower trendline, leaving the wider pattern intact.

A daily close below $1.32 would break the base of the measured Fibonacci range and expose the 200-day simple moving average near $1.27. That would deepen the correction, although XRP would remain technically inside its wider descending channel until price also closed beneath the lower trendline.

Buyers face the channel’s upper boundary in the mid-$1.30s. Moving above it would weaken the recent sequence of lower highs, while $1.40-$1.41 provides the first horizontal resistance. A later recovery through $1.47 would return XRP to the middle of its August range.

What would confirm the ETF signal

ETF inflows would carry more weight if XRP escaped the channel and recovered $1.41 with stronger trading volume. That combination would show that regulated fund demand was being reinforced by buyers across the wider market, rather than merely offsetting part of the existing selling pressure.

If inflows continued while XRP closed below $1.32, the opposite conclusion would apply: ETF demand would remain too small to stabilize the broader market.

Price still has to confirm the demand

September’s data do not support blaming Ripple’s escrow release alone for XRP’s decline. Most of the unlocked tokens returned to escrow, ETFs continued attracting capital and the wider crypto market also moved lower.

Those factors weaken a simple supply-driven explanation, but they do not establish that the correction has ended. Until XRP breaks its descending channel, positive ETF flows remain supporting evidence rather than confirmation of a recovery.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice.

The post XRP Price Slips Toward $1.32 Even as ETFs Add $14M appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/xrp-price-slips-even-etfs-add/

The post Hyperliquid Strategies Opens a $2.5B Funding Door – Will HYPE Benefit? appeared first on Coindoo.

Key Takeaways

What the $2.5 billion figure actually means

Hyperliquid Strategies’ September 1 filing increased the total commitment under its equity-purchase agreement with Chardan Capital Markets from $1 billion to $2.5 billion. The additional $1.5 billion gives the company more room to issue and sell PURR common shares under the agreement’s conditions.

The figure represents the maximum aggregate gross purchase price of those shares, rather than money already held by Hyperliquid Strategies. The filing concerns the Nasdaq-listed treasury company trading under PURR, not the Hyperliquid protocol itself.

And still the company’s wider strategy makes the amendment relevant to HYPE. Its latest annual report identifies accumulating the token as its primary business, although the expanded agreement provides no fixed allocation or buying schedule. Any future purchases would still begin with transactions in the equity market.

Four steps separate the facility from HYPE demand

1. Hyperliquid Strategies must issue PURR shares

The agreement allows the company to create and sell new common shares, but issuance does not happen automatically. Management decides when to use the facility and how much stock to offer.

2. The share sales still have to occur

Hyperliquid Strategies can raise money only when shares are purchased under the agreement. The amount collected will depend on how often the company uses the facility, how many shares it issues and the prices calculated under its terms.

Those prices determine the cost to existing shareholders. A lower PURR price requires more shares to raise the same amount of money, increasing dilution and using the applicable share allowance more quickly.

That constraint becomes more important after the first $1 billion of sales. From that point, shares issued below $12.02 count toward an aggregate limit of 42,641,847 shares, representing 19.99% of the common stock outstanding immediately before the amendment.

At just under $12.02 per share, raising the additional $1.5 billion would require more than 124.8 million shares—nearly three times the 42.64 million-share limit. Reaching the full capacity at those prices would therefore require shareholder approval unless Nasdaq rules permit an exception.

The $12.02 figure is not a minimum sale price. It is the threshold below which the share-count restriction applies, making PURR’s market value an important factor in how much of the facility can be used efficiently.

3. Completed sales must produce usable cash

Only completed transactions create cash that Hyperliquid Strategies can deploy. The $2.5 billion ceiling describes the agreement’s maximum gross purchase value, not proceeds already received.

4. Management must direct the money toward HYPE

Cash from PURR sales does not enter the HYPE market on its own. Management must authorize token purchases and report them before any portion of the expanded facility can be counted as direct HYPE demand.

READ MORE:

Hyperliquid’s $1.2B Fee Engine Puts HYPE in Focus

Will HYPE benefit?

HYPE could benefit, but not from the amendment alone. The token receives direct demand only when Hyperliquid Strategies completes PURR sales and uses the resulting capital to purchase HYPE.

Previous transactions show that this route is more than theoretical. In its August 27 financial update, the company reported raising $647 million through PURR issuance during the fiscal year while deploying $773 million from its available capital to acquire HYPE.

Those purchases helped increase its treasury from an initial 12.5 million tokens to 29.3 million HYPE by June 30. The figures should not be read as a one-to-one flow of the same money, but they show that equity financing has already supported the company’s broader accumulation strategy.

The latest amendment could extend that process, although management retains flexibility. The company’s annual filing says future capital may also support acquisitions involving businesses connected with the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Confirmed treasury purchases would add buying demand, but they would not guarantee an equivalent increase in HYPE’s market value. The price effect would depend on how quickly the company bought, the liquidity available at the time and how much supply other holders brought to the market.

HYPE holds near its record as the wider market slips

While that future buying power remains unconfirmed, HYPE is already displaying relative strength in the spot market. The token traded near $83.3 at approximately 07:00 UTC on September 2, about 4% below its late-August record near $86.70.

HYPE reached that record before the September 1 amendment, so the expanded facility cannot explain the rally but it may add another possible source of future demand. But for now no reported PURR sale or treasury purchase connects the agreement with the token’s current price.

HYPE’s resilience stands out against a market in which XRP fell to $1.32 despite positive ETF inflows. Larger assets were also contending with the yield and yen pressures weighing on crypto as September began.

The plan depends on two markets

Financing a HYPE treasury with newly issued stock ties the company’s buying power to the market value of PURR. A stronger PURR price allows Hyperliquid Strategies to raise capital with fewer new shares, while a weaker price makes the same strategy more dilutive and brings the exchange cap into play sooner.

That relationship becomes more demanding after HYPE’s August rally. New capital now buys fewer tokens than it did before the advance, leaving the company to weigh the price paid for HYPE against the number of PURR shares issued to finance each purchase.

The facility’s real strength will become visible in PURR’s sale prices, not in its $2.5 billion ceiling. Those prices could determine whether the expanded agreement provides efficient HYPE-buying power or remains largely unused capacity.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice.

The post Hyperliquid Strategies Opens a $2.5B Funding Door – Will HYPE Benefit? appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/hyperliquid-strategies-opens-a-2-5b-funding-door-will-hype-benefit/

The post HYPE Price Pulls Back as Rate-Hike Bets Surge appeared first on Coindoo.

Key Takeaways

Rate-hike expectations add pressure after HYPE’s record

HYPE reached an all-time high near $86.80 before retreating toward $81. The pullback came as interest-rate traders sharply increased their expectations for another Federal Reserve hike.

Expectations for a September hike strengthened throughout the day. Earlier Reuters reported that the probability initially rose from roughly 35% to 50%. By the time of writing, the CME FedWatch Tool placed the odds of a 25-basis-point increase at the September 16 meeting at 59.7%. Such a move would lift the target range from 3.50%-3.75% to 3.75%-4.00%, while the remaining probability pointed to no change and no rate cut was priced in.

The change followed Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh’s Jackson Hole address. Warsh said inflation remained above the Fed’s 2% objective and that policymakers had “work to do” unless the underlying trend moved clearly and quickly toward that target. His complete remarks are available through the Federal Reserve.

Higher rates increase the return available from cash and short-term government debt while making leveraged positions more expensive. That backdrop is relevant to HYPE after a roughly 70% advance from $51 to its $86.80 record left the token exposed to profit-taking.

The timing makes the shift in rate expectations relevant, although price action cannot establish it as the sole cause of the pullback.

Daily support and RSI divergence define the larger test

HYPE remaines inside its ascending daily channel near $81.30 at the time of writing. The decline brought price back toward the lower trendline in the low-$80 area, where buyers must defend the latest higher low to preserve the channel structure.

The wider trend remains upward, with HYPE trading well above its 50- and 100-day simple moving averages near $60.50. Their distance from the current price also shows how quickly the token climbed during August. Neither average is close enough to provide immediate support during the current pullback.

The first major horizontal level sits near $78, representing the 0.236 Fibonacci retracement of the advance from $51 to $86.80. Together with the lower channel boundary, it creates a broader support zone extending from the high-$70s into the low-$80s.

Momentum presents a separate warning. HYPE formed higher price highs during the final stage of the rally, while the daily Relative Strength Index produced lower highs. This bearish divergence indicates that momentum weakened as the token approached its record.

The divergence can persist during a strong uptrend and does not confirm a reversal by itself. An intraday move below the trendline would also carry limited weight if buyers reclaimed it before the daily close. A sustained daily close below $78 would provide stronger evidence of a deeper correction and expose the next Fibonacci support near $73.

Four-hour chart keeps a rebound in play

The shorter timeframe offers a more constructive signal. HYPE reacted above its rising 50-period simple moving average near $79.50 and remained inside the four-hour ascending channel. The latest candle recovered from a low near $80.20 toward $81.50, preserving the immediate support structure.

The four-hour RSI formed a hidden bullish divergence as price produced a higher low inside the channel while RSI moved to a lower low. This pattern can appear during a temporary correction within an established uptrend.

Continued closes above the 50-SMA would keep the rebound setup active. Buyers would then need to carry HYPE through the middle of the channel and above $84 to show that the move has developed beyond an initial reaction from support.

The four-hour signal does not erase the weaker momentum on the daily chart. HYPE can produce a short-term rebound while its broader momentum continues to deteriorate.

The daily chart carries more weight because it covers a broader period of trading and filters out more short-term volatility. The four-hour chart can identify an early rebound, but the higher timeframe provides stronger confirmation of whether the wider trend has changed.

A recovery above $84 would strengthen the rebound, while a break below $78 on the daily chart would signal that the larger correction is gaining control.

READ MORE:

Hyperliquid’s $1.2B Fee Engine Puts HYPE in Focus

HYPE must hold $78 to keep the $86.80 record in reach

• $78-$80 – primary support: This zone contains the rising four-hour 50-SMA, the daily channel boundary and the 0.236 Fibonacci retracement. Holding it would keep the rebound scenario active.
• $73 – breakdown target: The 0.382 Fibonacci retracement becomes the next visible support after a confirmed daily close below $78.
• $84-$86.80 – recovery zone: Reclaiming $84 would strengthen the rebound, while a move above $86.80 would require firmer daily momentum to support a sustainable breakout.

The post HYPE Price Pulls Back as Rate-Hike Bets Surge appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/hype-price-pulls-back-rate-hike-bets-surge/

The post XRP Price Stalls at $1.38 After Rejection – Who Takes Control? appeared first on Coindoo.

Key Takeaways

The August 27 breakout test failed

Our previous analysis of XRP’s three remaining breakout tests identified a close above $1.47-$1.50 as the first condition for escaping the descending channel.

XRP reached the channel ceiling near $1.47 and turned lower before confirming that close. The breakout never materialized, so XRP did not reach the retest stage. The previous $1.55 pivot remains untouched.

Price stalls near the channel midpoint

At the time of writing, XRP trades at approximately $1.38, down 3.1% over 24 hours. The pullback has paused around the middle of the channel after carrying price down from the latest rejection near $1.47.

The latest candles have small bodies and alternate between red and green. Buyers have so far absorbed attempts to push below the current range, while rebounds remain shallow. Neither side has produced enough follow-through to end the pause.

The lower boundary near $1.34 remains relevant if the current consolidation breaks down. XRP still has room inside the channel before reaching that line, making an immediate test of channel support premature.

Pattern invalidation requires a completed candle beneath the lower trendline and a weak attempt to recover it. The current sideways movement does not meet that condition.

RSI shows sellers have lost some momentum

The 14-period Relative Strength Index is near 41, below the neutral midpoint of 50 and its smoothed average of 47.8. The reading reflects the pressure created by the rejection, although the latest candles show that the decline has stopped accelerating.

Oversold territory begins near 30 under the conventional RSI interpretation. XRP has yet to reach that threshold. A recovery above the RSI average at 47.81 would provide the first sign of improving short-term momentum.

Derivatives still dominate XRP trading

At the time of writing, CoinGlass reports approximately $990.60 million in XRP spot volume and $4.35 billion in futures turnover. Derivatives volume is therefore about 4.39 times larger than spot volume.

The ratio has narrowed slightly from the 4.6 reading recorded in our previous analysis. Most reported trading continues to take place through derivatives. The ratio measures activity across the two markets and does not identify which side currently controls the price.

Open interest stands at approximately $3.23 billion, around $270 million below the earlier reading near $3.5 billion. The decrease shows that outstanding derivatives exposure has declined in dollar terms since the previous channel test.

CoinGlass also recorded approximately $13.21 million in XRP liquidations over 24 hours. That total covers positions already forced closed during the rolling window. No verified public heatmap level supports describing $1.35 as a liquidation wall.

XRP exchange reserves remain nearly unchanged

CryptoQuant places XRP reserves across tracked exchanges at approximately 2.6274 billion tokens, an increase of only 0.03% over 24 hours.

READ MORE:

Solana Backs 18.9M Less SOL Issuance by a 0.334-Point Margin

The consolidation creates a new immediate range

The immediate story is the pause near $1.38. Buyers have prevented another leg lower, while rebounds remain capped. A decisive close beyond the short-term range will identify which channel boundary returns to focus.

Spot demand needs to confirm the next move

For traders, it is no longer enough for XRP to simply move out of its current consolidation. What matters more is what is driving that move.

Lower open interest shows that part of the accumulated leverage has already been cleared, but futures still dominate trading activity. That leaves the market vulnerable to short-lived moves that look like breakouts at first but quickly reverse.

A more reliable signal would come if the move is backed by stronger spot volume, a firmer RSI reading and sustained price action after the initial impulse. Without that confirmation, traders have more reason to treat the first reaction with caution rather than assume a new direction has already been established.

This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice.

The post XRP Price Stalls at $1.38 After Rejection – Who Takes Control? appeared first on Coindoo.

Check our Market Overview 

Source: https://coindoo.com/xrp-price-stalls-rejection-who-takes-control/